If Wilder gets to 40-0, that'll put him #3 all-time behind Holmes (48-0) and Rocky (49-0)

I've always been a fan of his longer than you've been watching boxing son. You see, real fans don't need to resort to the garbage you tried to pass, or simply be kiss-ass of his. When you grow up, you'll get it child.

 

I'll ignore your first sentence because it is a strawman.

Is Gerald Washington worse than Purrity? Yes he is. I don't think you understand how weak this era of heavyweights are. Washington struggled with a very ancient and average Mansour, arguably lost to him. I don't think you've seen Purrity fight if you think he is worse than Washington; he wasn't.

Liakhovich was shot to pieces when he fought Wilder, I wouldn't count that as much of a win. We need to first see if Wilder actually gets past Ortiz but do I think he is better than Peter? Yes, but what is your point? Wlad beat him twice, toying with him in the rematch.

I'd take Sanders over Duhaupas, who sucks. Duhaupas is the same level as a Alex Leipai or Pianeta (who he lost to btw).

The competition is very different, Wilder has not faced one world class heavyweight. Schultz, Byrd, and Sanders are all better than anything Wilder has faced thus far, by leaps and bounds. Maybe if he KO's Ortiz It'll be a different story. I actually think Ortiz is a pretty good heavyweight and I'll give Wilder full credit for the win.

 

The pain and suffering? From posters? You think there's pain and suffering from his detractors so far? Based on Wilder defeating terribly weak comp for a champ? OK...whatever gets your boner going I guess....

 

I added the part about gold medal. You ignore that so you can act like a baby and repeat one line out of context. Probably bed time for you. Get your bottle and diaper....go to your crib son.

 

Yes, the pain and suffering Wilder causes posters who keep hoping he loses. It is comedy gold.

 

this nitwit thinks arguing with him means you hate Deontay.

 

Yes I'd take Puritty. He was vastly more experienced than Washington, who was a football player. I don't know what you've seen from Washington to think he is some world beater. He arguably lost to Mansour and got beaten down by Miller.

Most of Purrity's losses came from good, professional fighters; not a 43 year old part-timer late to the game of boxing or 300 pound icebergs.

 

I saw it, Liakhovich lost to Ruiz. To call it a robbery is hilarious. Ruiz didn't dominate like a lot of people thought he would but there is no way you could give the fight to SL. It was a clear win for Andy.

Wilder has power, no doubt about it and Liakhovich was always pretty chinny. Liakhovich at his best still loses to Wilder IMO, an over-the-hill one got KO'd badly.

 

Duhapuas has about 10% of the punching power of Sanders. And Sanders had quicker hands and was also a southpaw. Sanders was a bad style matchup for a lot of heavyweights and was probably an underachiever. He didn't have a HOF resume and I never argued that he did but he was a dangerous heavyweight, especially in the first 4-5 rounds.

I'd comfortably take any version of Wlad over Duhaupas 10/10 times.