80's heavyweights was NOT a weak era

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by InMemoryofJakeLamotta, Mar 1, 2018.


  1. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    16,235
    11,704
    Sep 21, 2017
    Relatively speaking. This is an oft repeated accusation, which I think is a way to denigrate Tyson and to a lesser extent, Holmes. The 80's generation of heavies introduced the first really skilled super heavies. Almost like the father generation of today's super heavies. For some reason, I consider Holmes an 80's fighter so I'll group him with the 80's for the purpose of this post.

    Maybe it's because since it came right after the 70's, people consider it "weak" in comparison. Some things the 70's had going for it was the showmanship and charisma of Muhammad Ali who was really skilled at promoting his own fights and building up public interest, the fact that you had 3 fighters considered ATG's in or near their prime that got to fight one another and it was the first era of boxing shown in color.

    But, that aside, if we consider the top talents (excluding the Big 3 Frazier, Foreman, Ali) of the 1970's, they weren't any more remarkable than the top talents of the 80's. Now, the top 70's talents tended to be more consistent, but they weren't really better per se. Think of the following hypothetical fights all at their best versions:

    Jerry Quarry vs Michael Spinks
    Ron Lyle vs Pinklon Thomas or Bonecrusher Smith
    Ken Norton vs Tony Tucker or Tim Witherspoon
    Jimmy Ellis vs Buster Douglas
    Trevor Berbick vs Earnie Shavers
    Jimmy Young vs Tony Tubbs

    Now, regardless of who you'd favor, one has to admit, none of the above fights are a foregone conclusion. Out of the matchups above, either has a chance to win it and you really wouldn't expect any blow outs.

    Also, the top 80's guys may have been more formidable H2H over the heavyweight contenders of generations past simply due to being bigger along with their skill level and would've likely been top rated contenders in any era of boxing. Some could beat the champions of today or run them very close. Would Tony Tubbs really not make it as a top contender in the 50's? Would Tony Tucker really fail to crack the top 10 in the 60's?

    I think the 80's were stronger than many like to give credit for.
     
    Bonecrusher, Pat M, BCS8 and 8 others like this.
  2. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,374
    83,251
    Nov 30, 2006
    Agreed. On top of the guys you mentioned you had Dokes, Tillis, and Williams bopping around...still had Neon Leon in the first half of the decade, Ruddock & Norris coming along in the back-end...

    Plenty of quality match-ups to be made (and some were in reality but those were just the iceberg's tip)
     
  3. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,577
    27,222
    Feb 15, 2006
    The 80s had the components of a strong era, but they didn't quite come together for various reasons.

    Between politics, and several key fighters dropping the ball, it was somehow undone.
     
  4. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,374
    83,251
    Nov 30, 2006
    But there was talent in the kitty, is the point.

    The way some people speak of it dismissively as though it were a h2h wasteland in which any stinkin' drunk could stumble in from the crowd and win a belt inside 10 fights doesn't ring true.
     
  5. Fergy

    Fergy Walking Dead Full Member

    29,554
    36,116
    Jan 8, 2017
    I've often wondered if Holmes hadn't been around and only one belt ,how the majority of the 80 s would have looked. Who'd have been the main man ,at least for a while ?
     
  6. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,577
    27,222
    Feb 15, 2006
    There was plenty of talent in the kitty.

    I can't understand how more didn't come of it to be honest!
     
  7. Jamal Perkins

    Jamal Perkins Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,701
    3,075
    Oct 19, 2012
    The 1980s were the most undisciplined era.but also one of the most talented with a superb mix of skilled talented athletes and quirky talents.

    I think 1970s spoiled writers hated the early 80s alphabet title merry go round and so many next big things imploding quickly (cooney,page,dokes,thomas etc).

    Overall thus i think it was a incredible era.

    Evidence of that is that if the following hadnt succumbed to drug abuse or poor management ,conditioning....they may well have been top 25 atg heavies (thomas,biggs,dokes,spoon)

    I dont think we will ever again see such a talented era.

    Holmes benefited by not fightingba peak thomas or dokes but in larrys defence these guys became shot junkies pretty quick after showing such title promise....larrys wins over berbick,spoon,cooney,williams,frazier and smith are a good bunch but his legacy is hurt with fights against cobb,bey, and frank......

    Tyson and holyfields 80s record is better.holy beat tillis,thomas,dokes and stewart and rodriguez.
     
  8. JackSilver

    JackSilver Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,050
    4,866
    Jun 24, 2017
    Weren’t around then but those that were, the question is, at the time did they all seem like a highly skilled bunch of talented individuals who were fortunate to appear around the same time or are you just looking back now nostalgically and maybe comparing them to today current heavyweight scene, think they were a lot better and more talented than they actually were?

    Looking back at times past, you mind can play tricks on you.
     
  9. zadfrak

    zadfrak Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,512
    3,107
    Feb 17, 2008
    No. They all blew hot and cold.There B games were horrible & the only guy to win showing up with his B game was Holmes. And it wasn't as if they fought top competition frequently. They'd fight B and C grade guys a lot more often than top five guys. It wasn't until Tyson came along and cleared up the whole mess that things were good.
     
  10. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,137
    13,093
    Jan 4, 2008
    It was a talented era, but the neither Holmes nor Tyson really faced the best versions of, or at all, several of the top talents like Page, Thomas, Tubbs, Dokes and Witherspoon. So while the talent was there, the two best of the 80's weren't really pitted against them as one would like.
     
    mrkoolkevin and Saad54 like this.
  11. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    61,208
    23,841
    Jul 21, 2012
    What most of then had was legs and movement that wasn't just forward and back. Even the hamwallets of the era who had the movement would cause the top guys today all sorts of problems.
    Look how that nobody just beat Chisora with a basic movement off the backfoot. Top 10'er Whyte went life n death with Chisora.
     
    Last edited: Mar 1, 2018
  12. Saad54

    Saad54 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,832
    6,599
    Dec 10, 2014
    I agree

    There were a lot of good hws in the early to mid '80s. Holmes dominated and then he stopped fighting the best HWs and they fought each other and none dominated. Then, Tyson cleaned house.
     
  13. Saad54

    Saad54 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,832
    6,599
    Dec 10, 2014
    They spent a lot of time beating each other. And then Tyson fought a faded version of Thomas, and slightly past best and overweight Tubbs.

    It's true most blew hot and cold, though.
     
    JohnThomas1 likes this.
  14. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,374
    83,251
    Nov 30, 2006
    Pretty much.
     
  15. Saad54

    Saad54 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,832
    6,599
    Dec 10, 2014
    I hope you're joking. Tillis and Thomas were WAY past it, and Dokes, while surprisingly competitive was not near his 81-83 peak. His foot movement was gone. Rodriguez was an overrated latin America based alphabet "contender." Stewart was solid but unknown at the time and supposed to be an easy steppingtone.