lol. You're the guy who can't score fights. The 10th round didn't end and therefore was not present on the judges scorecards.... You said it was.
I can score far better than you can, and it's obvious. We already know that Deontay W was winning on points (Had we counted what happened in the 10th). We also know the Deontay W knocked him out in the 10th. Like I said, perhaps you should learn to score a boxing match before talking to me about scoring. Just saying. I'm willing to teach noobs.
So @MVC! You're standing by your claim? The Judges scorecards were in favour of Wilder because of round 10?
My only claim was Deontay W was winning on the scorecards if we factor in everything that happened b4 the knockout Fact. The fact that you deny that, means you don't truly look at what happens in the entirety of the fight, which ultimately makes you a noob. I'm however, willing to teach you how to score a fight. I have helped many.
I've not claimed or denied anything..... But i'm surprised someone as knowledgable as yourself doesn't know that a round has to finish for it to be recorded on the scorecards.
I only truly care about the real score factoring in everything that happened preceding the knockout. If we objectively factor in everything, there was no robbery before the knockout because Deontay W was in reality winning on the cards if we factor the knockdowns in as well. He would be up 1-2 points, objectively speaking. If you can't understand that, I just don't know what to tell you.
They be greasing the **** out him, makes me think of GSP/Silva from the UFC them dudes be getting slathered down.
I understand fully that you're avoiding the question and talking random nonsense. But why don't you know that an uncompleted round isn't added to the scorecards?
I just don't think you TRULY understand real scoring. You may have a point if it was an RTD or a TKO at the conclusion of the 9th round. However, what transpired in the 10th has to be counted as well if we're going by OBJECTIVE and ACCURATE scoring. There was no robbery because of the knockdowns that occurred in the 10th, which would of course be factored into the scoring. Therefore, Deontay W was actually not truly losing the fight on points by the time the knockdown occurred. The round may not have been completed, but taking the knockdowns into consideration. You can clearly see that Deontay W was actually winning on the scorecards. I'm talking about objective scoring.
@OpinionOfACasual I have MVC blocked, I can't be bothered with him but.. Tell him to go and search the words "Wilder Ortiz Scorecards" and go to images. They all have Wilder ahead after 9 completed rounds. So regardless of the 10th round even after 9 round they all had Wilder ahead 85-84.
85-84 85-84 85-84......They're not possible after 10 rounds. Stop digging man. I haven't even commented on who should have been ahead etc etc... Just stating that you don't understand a simple rule.
? That's not the point, the point of the matter is that we're taking into account REAL objective scoring. I'm sorry you do not know real objective scoring.
He's claiming i'm an idiot for having Ortiz ahead.... Despite - a) 99.9% of viewers having Ortiz ahead b) I've not even commented on who i had ahead lol.
Deontay was NOT behind when he knocked out Ortiz because when we take into account what happened in the entirety of the fight, the knockdowns PRECEDING the knockout has to count.
You argued that Wilder slipped against Nichols because the 'referee said so'. Well.... You don't include an incomplete round in the scorecards because 'The rules say so'.