Gassiev confirms Wilder is more powerful and more talented than Wlad.

"Klitschko is a very clever boxer, he's very smart in the way that he uses his long arms, his height. He just keeps his left out. To those who are shorter, it is impossible to get close to him. He has a very discreet right cross. You simply do not see it, it appears out of nowhere. But I would not say that his power is super-strong - just a good, strong punch for a heavyweight" Gassiev told Match TV.

"Wilder is the hardest worker I've been in with. He's the hardest puncher, in addition he has dangerous angles to his attacks that are difficult to understand. If Klitschko has a classic technique, then Wilder is very unusual and his attacks are very difficult to defend against. If you look from the outside, the movements seem clumsy, but in the ring they work in a very efficient manner."

Which is exactly what I've been telling youse "no talent" crowd. Y'all're sleeping on the man's line of sight game. Youse have been from the beginning.

It's time to stop making yourself look like a dumb little candy ass and at least speak to what the man actually does rather than your vague personalized bull****.

Marciano gets the same treatment over in classic. It's god awful. Everyone wants to talk about size and classic technique and compare mother ****ers they say are similar. You know what Marciano and Frazier have in common? ****in' next to dick. The same **** that any man around his size with a punch has in common. Outside of that, outside of vague **** like Frazier's size and him got a good left hook what is the similarity? Does Joe cross step to throw his left hook? Then it's a pretty ****ing different left init ya dick?

Line of sight boxing, take a good ****in' look, this is how it works. It worked for Marciano and it works for Deontay Wilder. To never address it then purpose it's defeat is stupid. Not like the gay Dustin bull**** y'all circlejerk yerselves over. Youse know no one gives a **** about Wilder slipping outside of yer ***** clique, but when skills and talents become the subject then tone changes doesn't it? All of a sudden you go from a clown to an expert, gonna change my mind and ****, but I know and you know it's just a show. You've picked up a handful of terms and let us know the full extent of your boxing technical vocab in every post on the matter. I know because of the **** you say, or rather the **** you never ever say. You know from the lack of research your ass has ever done. Picked up your knowledge casually but you ain't a casual because you share that bull**** on a forum? Suck a D ya casual *****, this is what hardcore looks like. Spotting a little known technique from a decade away, and being able to explain said technique in historical context. You ain't even close to me.

When I first came here I threw down the gauntlet, called y'all counterfeits, said ain't none of you know what yer talking about, and honestly outside of five or six posters I stand by that. When you run your mouth all your doing is shouting " I form strong opinions before I have a strong understanding of the subject" or " I'm really ****ing stupid and think this is good idea and shines a good light on myself for any in the know" take your pick they mean the same damn thing. Rather than impress knowledgeable fans, maybe get your opinion highlighted and become a legend, such as I, you'd rather say some vague bull**** to get in where you fit in.

I don't mind someone saying Holyfield could beat Marciano, but not addressing line of sight, you're an ignorant dumb ****. I don't actually give any ****s if you think Wilder is ****, but telling me he was being outboxed by Szpilka is like strapping a big ol' sign that reads " Too ******ed to understand boxing outside of what he's picked up on broadcasts from broadcasters and their outlets" to your back. If you want respect, real respect, the kind of **** that when you sign up for a new forum the mother ****ers working on books contact you with thanks before you've even gotten an opportunity to introduce yourself to that forum. Then stop acting like you know dick when you know that you don't. I see you as a worm, a cancer, a disease that infects fandom and brings it down into the muck where conversations about boxers become arguments about the arguers and thing like truth and knowledge become second class to offensive speech sliding along the rules line.

My next post addressing the blind Wilder hate will be racial. I may be banned for it, I'm not sure. However, there is a system in boxing that has been since the 1790s that banks, literally, on racists paying to hate on a man. If you weren't a racist or at least some kind of bigot the system wouldn't work on you, simple. I'll lay out the system and juxtaposed to it some of you will qualify. It could be considered racial trolling to point out your actions and opinions were pegg'd centuries ago by a man who explicitly sought to make money off your unreasonable hate. I dunno, the forum's weird on race relations, seems to favor harboring racism rather than removing it. Either way, Mendoza's is a good tale and puts money on the subject rather than opinion. You know yer a racist, you know you've found a place that protects you from being called out on it. Well, ya racist ****, I will be calling you out on it, this is boxing, of course we have academia and history dealing with you mongrels and your behaviors. When the shoe fits, ****. It's time to Hammer some of you straight ain't it?