January 9, 1942: Joe Louis vs a modern super heavyweight

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by InMemoryofJakeLamotta, Mar 23, 2018.


  1. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    17,356
    12,764
    Sep 21, 2017
    So Kevin McBride, fresh off of his win against Mike Tyson is full of himself and decides to go back in time to vanquish other ATG's. He decides to start in the 1940's and dusts off his trusty time machine and decides to make Joe Louis his first victim.

    How does the 6'6 270 pounder do against the Louis who vanquished Buddy Baer in 1 round?

    Joe Louis
    This content is protected


    vs

    Kevin McBride
    This content is protected
     
  2. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    17,356
    12,764
    Sep 21, 2017
  3. robert ungurean

    robert ungurean Богдан Philadelphia Full Member

    17,126
    16,868
    Jun 9, 2007
    Louis beats the #### out of him. KO befor the 5th
     
  4. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    65,777
    52,889
    Feb 11, 2005
    McBride is a nice guy but he is what goes wrong when size is not accompanied by a spark of athleticism.
     
  5. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    17,356
    12,764
    Sep 21, 2017
    Would you say he's better or worse than Buddy Baer?
     
  6. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    17,356
    12,764
    Sep 21, 2017
    So you see it more like Louis vs Simon?
     
  7. robert ungurean

    robert ungurean Богдан Philadelphia Full Member

    17,126
    16,868
    Jun 9, 2007
    In a way yes. I just think too much emphasis is put on size. Guys like Louis Dempsey Liston were athletic 200 lb men who were technically sound men who could fight and could punch hard enough to stop men who were considerably bigger. They were proven great fighters
     
  8. Grapefruit

    Grapefruit Active Member Full Member

    1,215
    944
    Dec 19, 2017
    Louis would snap his head back and make him twirl around too. Size does matter, but size only matters so much, he was no where near Louis on skill.
     
  9. The Long Count

    The Long Count Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,584
    9,152
    Oct 8, 2013
    Here’s the deal some fighters can go pro and get somewhat far strictly because of their size- tye fields, McBride, Grant.. Louis could likely beat those guys - superior coordination, timing and athletic explosiveness. In fact he beat guys like Simon, Buddy Baer, and Carnera. Bested them convincingly.
    However the elite big men of today, K2, Joshua, also have athleticism that the big men of his day lacked. They have a far higher ceiling than the mcbride’s Of the world who linger around just on sheer size getting them by.
    Louis to me was talented enough to maybe defeat these guys in a peak performance type showing but he would not be able to win with the regularity that he did in his day swimming in a fish tank with these guys. It’s too much height and weight disadvantage day in and out to concede and be as successful as he was in his time. Now if we give Louis, modern strength training and weights and supplements (legal ones) and he adds 15lbs of muscle to his frame. He’d have a very good career. But if he we take him as is, from his day, he’d Win some and lose some.
    Just my 2 cents.
     
  10. Jel

    Jel Obsessive list maker Full Member

    8,034
    13,699
    Oct 20, 2017
    The obvious answer is - depends who he's fighting. As has been stated, size alone is not enough. If it was, Jess Willard would have beaten Jack Dempsey and Primo Carnera would have reigned as heavyweight champion for as long as wanted. Also, middleweights like Mickey Walker and Harry Greb couldn't have had the success they had against heavyweights of their time.

    If we think a 190 pound James Toney could beat Kevin McBride, is a fully fledged heavyweight like Joe Louis going to struggle?

    The old adage is a good big'un beats a good little'un, but if a great little'un meets an average big' un (e.g. Roy Jones v John Ruiz), I'm picking the smaller guy. There's another thread with Bruno v Frazier and I picked Frazier on the same basic principle.
     
  11. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. Full Member

    55,255
    10,363
    Jun 29, 2007
    Right.

    1 ) There are skilled super heavyweights
    2 )Moderately skilled super heavyweights
    3 ) and merely big guys with limited skills

    McBride is the third and without a top chin. Louis inside of five rounds.
     
  12. The Long Count

    The Long Count Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,584
    9,152
    Oct 8, 2013
    Would you say there were any “skilled” super heavies in Louis’s time?

    And what would say someone like Carlos Takam would rate in Louis’s time. As super heavy or just a big heavy
     
  13. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    17,356
    12,764
    Sep 21, 2017
    This sounds reasonable.
     
    The Long Count likes this.
  14. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    17,356
    12,764
    Sep 21, 2017
    Not "skilled" compared to the super heavies of today, at least not the top of the heap super heavies. If you look at some of AJ's opponents he stopped on the come up, Carnera could indeed be better than some of them.
     
    The Long Count likes this.
  15. Fergy

    Fergy Walking Dead Full Member

    32,061
    40,016
    Jan 8, 2017
    Louis by mid rounds ko .McBride may use his weight/height advantage for a little while, but he hadn't the skills to stop Joe from pulverising him so to speak. By the Sixth round ,Louis s punches would be making a bloody mess of his face ,and smacking in to the body.
     
    InMemoryofJakeLamotta likes this.