Sky Commentary has hit new lows tonight

I would stick my tongue up Anna Woolhouse's bung hole.

 

Articulate, eloquent, expressive...almost William Wordsworth like in presentation. Great work.

 

And her actual Boxing Credentials

This content is protected

Just watch that and you can see why she got the job.Because of Sky quota filling and having to have a Female onboard

 

It's alright having birds presenting sports as long as they know their place and understand that they are just there to look nice. The problem is when they get above their station and start thinking they know what they're talking about or that anyone cares about their opinions. But in todays political climate SkySports will probably end up like the BBC where they have ugly lezzas like Clare Baldwin presenting shows.

 

For me smith talks too much and misses the action so many times in the round he goes off on a tangent and the fight has turning points with punches and he misses it then resumes

 

Last nights commentary was a full on embarrassment. They started talking about golf at one stage. The Froch scorecard was a joke throughout but then he redeemed himself at the end when he rightly said that Joshua sent no real message to Wilder with that **** performance.

 

Ridiculous commentary! I dislike Joshua but realised last night it's sky who disgust me most on board the AJ hype train. I got flashbacks of the Takam commentary, which was equally shocking.

Firstly I'll say AJ won the fight for sure, nobody can question that. But sky were suggesting another 'masterclass' early on, despite the fact AJ had barely landed a shot. He was pushing the action which was winning him rounds and looked hard to hit, though it was poor boxing all round from both guys. In the midst of sky creaming themselves, around the 4th, Parker lands the best right hand of the fight, clean, and sky don't even mention it. AJ took it well to be fair, but sky didn't even show a replay. Instead they showed a clip of AJ's 'effective jabs', all but one of them missing the target.

When AJ tired and Parker won a few rounds on the spin, they were forced to give him credit. Yet even at that, Smith says "This is why AJ is so exciting!" Give me a break.

I get it it, AJ is their goldenboy, he's undefeated, accumulating a decent resume and sky have an obligation to promote him. But it's a joke at this stage. They really insult anyone who knows anything about boxing with their shameless bias and propaganda. Their team is a collection of unintelligent cheerleaders, reading the script for their pay-checks. It's 90% hype, 10% analysis. If even.

 

my god the aj fight was terrible... I am never watching another aj fight on sky with commentary on.. that was disgraceful.. they made it sound like AJ was winnign easily... especially early on when neither fighter were doing like nothing special .. they were praising aj saying he was doing so well.. I was like wtf? he barely landed anything the first 3 rounds lol.. "look at that pressure look at thatpressure hes putting on parker" total clowns.

 

Quote of the weekend.

 

Who was awful?

 

That was Froch's input along with what a terrific gameplan had been put together to beat Parker (no doubt by his good buddy Rob McCracken).

 

my stream switched to showtime before the aj fight lol. paulie malignaggi is the best commentator going. I don't know how froch got on except for the fact that he's from the matchroom mob.

 

How was Paulie calling it mate? Would've enjoyed listening to some unbiased commentating.

 

they had it close until the last few rounds when parker became less active.

 

How Froch has a job is beyond me.