Tyson Fury one of the most talented heavyweights ever?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Tyson Fury Goat, Apr 3, 2018.


  1. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,561
    May 4, 2017
    Watch a film study on head movement on youtube, how many punches did Fury slip, he was out of range while moving his head, Ali was much better at slipping shots.
     
  2. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,561
    May 4, 2017
    He did v Morrison and Stewart.
     
    kriszhao likes this.
  3. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    60,923
    23,325
    Jul 21, 2012
    Fury was in no way mentally prepared having only 24 fights to cope with being on a world wide stage that massive. Any fighter would , and many did , crumble under the pressure of being part of such a huge gut wrenching event.
    Fury walked into Wlads back yard and made him look like an out of town jasper. Fact.
     
  4. Sugar 88

    Sugar 88 Woke Moralist-In-Chief

    27,259
    18,341
    Feb 4, 2012
    Fury's also a genetic freak which allows him to employ such an awkward style. He's got skills yes but it's his crazy size which makes him such a difficult proposition.
     
    Tyson Fury Goat likes this.
  5. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,561
    May 4, 2017
    On a side note Manny Steward also said Oba Carr was the most talented fighter he ever trained so sometimes great trainers can judge fighters all wrong, he even said Hamed punched harder than Lennox Lewis!
     
  6. kriszhao

    kriszhao Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,896
    2,150
    Feb 8, 2008
    Shulz
     
  7. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    60,923
    23,325
    Jul 21, 2012
    Oba Carr was talented. And he likely said that around 1990 for promotional purposes. He had no affiliation with Fury so had no reason to say it if he didn't believe it.
     
  8. effigy

    effigy Member Full Member

    467
    450
    Nov 23, 2008
    Fury's best attribute is his footwork by far. At that size it's a gift, take a look at similar sized fighters footwork and it's like night and day. The rest is down to his size, it's what makes him such a unique opponent, his jab and head movement are decent, sure, but it's coupled with his size that makes them good.
     
  9. Tyson Fury Goat

    Tyson Fury Goat Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    4,876
    3,292
    Apr 21, 2017
    that's a good point
     
  10. Luis Fernando

    Luis Fernando Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,120
    1,275
    Aug 23, 2017
    Doesn't change the fact that past 39 year old heavyweight champions lost to far inferior opponents than Fury. If Fury can come back and do something impressive, then he'll prove his worth. Otherwise, he is relatively unproven.
     
    kriszhao likes this.
  11. Hattonmad

    Hattonmad Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,647
    4,841
    Jan 5, 2009
    Your logic is silly. Does Calzaghe not get credit for beating Hopkins? Every fighter is different, every fighter ages differently. Wlad was unified champion when Fury beat him, unbeaten in ten years. Past him prime undoubtedly, but the best heavyweight in the world. It's a fantastic win. You're a hater.
     
  12. Staminakills

    Staminakills Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,329
    2,095
    Jun 8, 2012
    Can't grasp the fact his wife was in the hospital with post depression, means nothing to you ?
    That's entirely the reason wlad was Ill prepared physically and totally unfit to compete mentally
     
  13. Luis Fernando

    Luis Fernando Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,120
    1,275
    Aug 23, 2017
    No, I'm just holding everyone to the same standard. If you want to give Tyson Fury so much credit for beating a 39 year old, past his best champion. I'm going to also have to see Tyson Fury at age 39, beat the next / future best heavyweight in the world that is 10+ years younger. Otherwise, Fury deserves very little credit!

    Fury deserves no more credit for beating a 39 year old Wlad than Danny Williams does for beating a 38/39 year old Mike Tyson. Or James Toney does for beating a 39 year old Evander Holyfield. Or Trever Berbick does for beating Muhammad Ali.

    Just holding everyone to the same standard! It'd be unfair for me to give me Fury extra credit than others.
     
    kriszhao likes this.
  14. LD Boxer-Puncher

    LD Boxer-Puncher Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,777
    1,176
    May 10, 2017
    That's irrelevant and doesn't answer the question

    (Question is about natural talent, not greatness of the career)
     
  15. juice20

    juice20 Active Member Full Member

    841
    53
    Sep 9, 2012
    Based off what? His win over Wlad? Good win. So was Buster Douglas over tyson, where he looked incredible. And had Douglas retired immediately after, no one would be mentioning him amongst the most skilled ever based off one outstanding performance. Neither should Fury be in the discussion unless he comes back from the fat farm and puts together some more high level wins against the best opposition.
     
    highlander and kriszhao like this.