Tyson Fury one of the most talented heavyweights ever?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Tyson Fury Goat, Apr 3, 2018.


  1. Hattonmad

    Hattonmad Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,647
    4,841
    Jan 5, 2009
    You're an absolute lunatic. How can you hold everyone to the same standard when every 39-year-old you've named boxed at a different standard while aged 39. Age is literally just a number, especially in sport. Bernard Hopkins got better with age, an age most guys decline. Wlad's prime was arguably in his mid 30's. Mike Tyson was at his best in his early 20's.

    There is zero logic to what you're saying. Every fighter peaks and declines at different ages. We seen Wlad come back at 41 almost KO Anthony Joshua. You're obviously a wind up merchant. I won't be wasting any more time with you. Goodluck in life.
     
    DoubleJab666 and dinovelvet like this.
  2. Luis Fernando

    Luis Fernando Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,120
    1,275
    Aug 23, 2017
    How many Olympics gold medalists have there been at age 39 or after in athletic sports?

    Age isn't 'JUST' a number. Age dictates what level one's reflexes, mental sharpness, speed and overall athleticism are at.

    Bernard Hopkins had inconsistent performances after the age of 39. He absolutely wasn't doing as well as he was doing at a younger age.

    If Wlad fought bums / journeyman after age 40, then he could win but against the absolute top boxers who are 10+ years younger, it's a different story altogether!

    Science contradicts your viewpoint about athleticism and aging! Come back to me and tell me how well Fury does, after he reaches age 39 or beyond. Until then, your point is moot and Fury's achievement of beating a 39 year old Wlad who was ill prepared counts for very little until Fury himself can do better by the same age.
     
    kriszhao and SmackDaBum like this.
  3. SmackDaBum

    SmackDaBum TKO7 banned Full Member

    5,191
    1,715
    Nov 22, 2014
    Without a question - yes he is.

    Not unbeatable, but one of - if not the most talanted of all time for sure.
     
  4. SmackDaBum

    SmackDaBum TKO7 banned Full Member

    5,191
    1,715
    Nov 22, 2014
    Like Rigondeaux against Lomachenko, or Parker vs Joshua.

    Ali was always out of range. Moved his head back against small and short opponents.

    Just like Ali for his time. The combination of size and movement is what's so great about them compared to the rest of their divisions.
     
  5. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,559
    May 4, 2017
    Liston had more reach than Ali, so did Foreman, Ali used the rope a dope and great glove control of Foreman`s lead hand! Loma is far better than Parker or Wlad, look how Loma used the jab Fury didn`t throw as many jabs as that and ran all over the place Loma was right in front of Rigo while moving still positioning himself so he can counter, Fury didn`t throw enough counters because he was out of range and far more negative tan Loma was, Rigo`s reach was longer than Loma`s, your not trying to say Fury could be the p4p best boxer in the world are you? That would be going too far!
     
  6. SmackDaBum

    SmackDaBum TKO7 banned Full Member

    5,191
    1,715
    Nov 22, 2014
    Foreman 78.5
    Ali 79.
    Liston 84.

    Both Speed and height goes to Ali over liston and speed over Foreman.

    So not that hard for his head movement leaning backwards to be effective.
     
  7. reckless

    reckless Active Member Full Member

    1,139
    1,235
    Mar 18, 2018
    He had one great win and is a complete featherfist. Since that win he's failed a drug test and not had a single fight.
     
    madballster and Heisenberg like this.
  8. madballster

    madballster Loyal Member Full Member

    37,210
    6,765
    Jul 21, 2009
    No Tyson Fury is not a talented boxer. There are no genes that make you a good boxer (or singer, or violinist).
     
  9. greenhornet

    greenhornet Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,720
    2,839
    Nov 14, 2016
    fury's uncle was sick and he used it as an excuse to run for the hills from ustinov. you are hilarious, spend years saying wlad sucks, now say fury is great for beating an old, shot wlad. wlad giving joshua everything he wanted at age 41 just shows joshua is a huge hype job.
     
  10. greenhornet

    greenhornet Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,720
    2,839
    Nov 14, 2016
    he was getting badly schooled by an old, shot, featherfisted cw. needed to lay on him every chance he got to wear him down enough to get a pathetic victory.
     
  11. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    60,909
    23,285
    Jul 21, 2012
    Oh yeah , his uncle had just past away too , so Fury was dealing with bereavement on top of everything else. Forgot about that.
    If i was just a blind hater , i could say Fury is a bum like a lot of others do and use the fact he lost to such a guy to further this agenda im supposed to have against him. There's no shame in losing to an exceptional talent like Tyson Fury at the end of the day.
     
  12. greenhornet

    greenhornet Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,720
    2,839
    Nov 14, 2016
    you are the worst hater on this forum. most everything you spew is straight up bs.
     
    On The Money and Fashionista like this.
  13. Hookie

    Hookie Affeldt... Referee, Judge, and Timekeeper Full Member

    7,054
    376
    Dec 19, 2009
    Hold on! Not the same Wladimir Klitschko. Klitschko was much better prepared for Joshua... and you know this. I think you are just trolling. Fury is/was decent but he don't get carried away.
     
  14. Gymbot

    Gymbot Active Member Full Member

    1,316
    1,477
    Mar 8, 2017
  15. Hookie

    Hookie Affeldt... Referee, Judge, and Timekeeper Full Member

    7,054
    376
    Dec 19, 2009
    A death in the family motivates some. Douglas beat Tyson after his mother died... Tyson had just lost a sister, not many people ever mention that though.