Tyson Fury's record is more impressive than Wilder's...

But is it really THAT much more impressive.

He's beaten a once-great old fighter. A good, but not dominant Crusierweight Champ. A tough guy, twice who is now 29-8, and a few other good Journeymen.

 

Yes. The Wlad win is all anyone needs to have a much more exceptional resume then Wilder.

 

Chisora and Hammer (not even including Wlad) are better than anyone Wilder has beaten aside from Ortiz.

 

Doesn't matter imo, regardless of Resumes , fury would box wilders ears off

 

Eh, what does this argument matter? Both are obviously among the three most significant players in the division. There's time for both men to add lustre to their respective records, and I expect they will end up duking it out for all the heavyweight marbles at some stage. Let's see where it all goes.

 

duhaupas beats either, easily.

 

Then Joshua KOing him 15 months later was beating an "old" guy?

 

Stiverne is right up with either one of those guys, so is Arreola and Washington.

 

and he has only had less then 25 fights wilder has 40 LOOOOOOOL

 

Parker’s resume is better than wilders as well if you take out Ortiz.

 

Not in my opinion, no.

 

Duhaupas has been beaten anytime he stepped up, really. It's a good fight but I think Chisora is a more impressive win. Chisora is a clown but he's a damn good fighter and better than his record indicates. He has a ton of controversial losses. I think he beats anyone on Wilder's resume aside from Ortiz.

Washington has done absolutely nothing at Heavyweight. His best win is a horribly boring decision over fat and undersized Chambers. He's decent, but I don't think it's fair to compare him against a prime Chisora or even Hammer.

Arreola and Stiverne are guys who get blasted anytime they face top guys. Neither have an impressive performance or win. I know HW isn't deep, but these guys don't have any respectable wins.