>>> When the best W on your resume is Danny Jacobs...

I thought his win against Canelo was better...

 

Pretty sure Golovkin is famous & you're just a guy on the internet.

 

Golovkin already belonges in the same league as Hopkins, Hagler and Monzon. History will prove this whether you like it or not

 

I wouldn't bother if I were u. Just troll him back its all he's good for. He lives for this look at his thread history.

Troll the troll.

 

Plus he's using a Chromebook that he bought on Black Friday at Walmart.

 

Bought? I think it probably 'slipped' under the baggy white t shirt 'accidentally'...

 

When the only guy you talk about day and night is GGG...

then your butt must be hurting really badly.

 

Imagine what Hopkins, Hagler and Monzon would do to guys like Canelo and Jacobs. GGG good fighter but just not on those guys level.

 

'Imagine' all the people..

 

Jacobs is an excellent fighter. I can think of lots of MW's, even great MW's, who would struggle with a mobile, flurrying, hard hitting 185lb fighter on any given night.

 

I think Peter Quillin is the real deal & world class. They should rematch, he was robbed.

 

You forgot one thing. He beat the top competition as an OLD MAN. This isn't a prime, young golovkin. This is a past-prime old man with a walking stick golovkin, beating these guys up.

He had to fight them without the use of much movement, with slightly less stamina, and against Jacobs had to contend with a massive height disadvantage, which is the main reason why Jacobs was competitive. It's a tall order for any fighter in any era who had the disadvantages that GGG had against these guys.

Just imagine what a younger, prime, fast golovkin does to Mr Cheat and the Tall Bloke. He absolutely makes them look like amateurs.

 

This thread was 3 pages long when i logged off earlier..