BJS on PED use

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Heisenberg, Apr 26, 2018.


  1. zulander

    zulander Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,876
    1,542
    Mar 17, 2006
    I always thought Mossley's links to bad substances were forgotten about later in his career.
     
    Twentyman likes this.
  2. Wass1985

    Wass1985 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,436
    2,839
    Feb 18, 2012
    That's what i can't stand about most fighters, they are complete hypocrites!
     
  3. moog

    moog Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,838
    6,075
    Mar 12, 2012
    Spot on m8, great post.
     
    Scissors and Twentyman like this.
  4. S.K

    S.K Active Member banned Full Member

    905
    599
    Jan 7, 2017
    Even if he is that’s completely irrelevant, nothing wrong with Ingle using PEDs.
     
  5. lencoreastside

    lencoreastside Obsessed with Boxing banned Full Member

    20,213
    5,012
    Dec 27, 2010
    Perhaps not 20, but ingles physique for a man his age carries a suspicion of steroid use. So he's not exactly setting a great example. For that reason alone it's hard to blame people for pointing the finger at the ingle gym. Ingle probably needs to get tested as clean himself to lead by example. ...Not to mention KGs positive test too.
    No proof, but there is some grounds for suspicion....
     
    Scissors and Twentyman like this.
  6. lencoreastside

    lencoreastside Obsessed with Boxing banned Full Member

    20,213
    5,012
    Dec 27, 2010

    ...er...HELLO.....have you ever heard of " leading by example"? What a stupid, ignorant thing to say....have a rethink and cop yourself on!
     
  7. S.K

    S.K Active Member banned Full Member

    905
    599
    Jan 7, 2017
    You joking me here?

    Is ingle a boxer? A professional athlete of any kind who has rules to follow? No, he isn’t. If he decides to take PEDs, that’s completely his own choice, which he has the complete right to do, which is FULLY legal and is not against any rule. He isn’t fighting people and potentially killing people on a regular basis.

    However, his fighters do have rules to follow, and tling PEDs would be against these rules and get them a ban, and they are punching people on a regular basis trying to hurt them, potentially manslaughter, so to compare the two, is quite frankly absurd. They are not comparable.
     
    BitPlayerVesti and BodyBlaster like this.
  8. lencoreastside

    lencoreastside Obsessed with Boxing banned Full Member

    20,213
    5,012
    Dec 27, 2010
    I never joke with someone too dumb to get the joke. It would be unfair. So no, I'm not joking.
    Suggest you look up things like "role model" and 'leading by example".
     
  9. S.K

    S.K Active Member banned Full Member

    905
    599
    Jan 7, 2017
    Shut up you idiot, I suggest you look up the word ‘logical’. As there is zero logic to what your saying. I like how some moron posters like yourself fail to reply with a productive response, but instead just reply with stupidity, and with nothing at all to actually explain your opinion.

    I don’t want to be to harsh on you because you are clearly on the learning disability spectrum. I would say at the very low end (IQ = 30).
     
    BodyBlaster likes this.
  10. S.K

    S.K Active Member banned Full Member

    905
    599
    Jan 7, 2017
    Ingle get tested? Stop being such a ****ing idiot. Why the hell would he ever get tested? THERE IS NOTHING ILLEGAL, IMMORAL OR UNETHICAL with ingle taking PEDs. Swear to god, your an absolute idiot.

    Do you even realise PEDs are COMPLETELY legal?
     
  11. obelector

    obelector Member Full Member

    415
    420
    May 8, 2017
    true enough, i watched a bit of that terrible presser with browne where whyte was screaming 'junkie junkie' at browne, who then responds with, well, you've been done for the same thing. i had no idea, whereas with other fighters its bought up constantly to remind you of their transgressions.
     
    Twentyman likes this.
  12. lencoreastside

    lencoreastside Obsessed with Boxing banned Full Member

    20,213
    5,012
    Dec 27, 2010
    Look up “guilt by association” . Ingles suspected ped use puts his boxers under a cloud of suspicion. Him testing clean would maybe dispel such suspicion. Do you understand?
     
  13. S.K

    S.K Active Member banned Full Member

    905
    599
    Jan 7, 2017
    Completely. Irrelevant.

    I won’t say it again.
     
  14. lencoreastside

    lencoreastside Obsessed with Boxing banned Full Member

    20,213
    5,012
    Dec 27, 2010
    You want logic? Ok here's some for you. It's called Duck Logic....and it goes like this:

    "If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck.....then it's probably a duck".

    This applies (perhaps unfairly I know) to the ingle gym. If ingle and KG ( the gym boss himself and one of its star boxers) look like they're on PEDs, walk like they're on PEDS, and quack like they're on PEDs ...then a lot of people will assume drug use is present in the Ingle gym. So it follows from this that Ingle being implicated in drug use IS relevant. Do you understand?
     
  15. S.K

    S.K Active Member banned Full Member

    905
    599
    Jan 7, 2017
    No, because now you’ve added KG to the equation, which doesn’t form any part of our debate. Also, to make assumptions based on association is completely wrong, it’s rarely going To be a Correct assumption.

    To reiterate - there is nothing wrong with ingle using PEDs. And the fact is, there is absolutely no proof he’s even using PEDs. He’s a big bloke but there are many blokes MUCH bigger who have never touched a steroid in their life.