Dillian Whyte to be second mandatory after he beats Ortiz! What??

Scott, thompsn and Jennings were all coming off recent losses whereas Brown was not. Makes a big difference. Except with Joshua, Whyte hasnt lost many rounds and you forget Ortiz also has a couple of Ndec

Tell me what top undefeated HWs Ortiz has a win over?

 

lmao
You are talking such a BS. I can't stand this **** anymore.

Jennings lost to the best HW out there for a decade (Wlad) before he fought Ortiz. Ortiz KNOCKED him down and TKOd him. Wlad couldn't do that before.

Scott won TWO fights before he fought Ortiz (Leapei, Thompson) so WHERE he came from a recent loss?! You can not even read a resume correctly.

And Thompson. Yeah, Tony Thompson was past his prime but still names like Takam, Pulev or Wlad didn't do better vs Thompson than Ortiz. Ortiz KO6. Takam and Pulev only won via decision vs Thompson and Klitschko did it in the same round as Ortiz via TKO.

Compare the resume of Browne with Scott, Thompson or Jennings resume. This must be a joke what you are writing here.

Browne has exactly one legit win and this was Chagaev. But we should not forget he was behind at the cards and it was a lucky punch. Apart from that Browne fought ONLY bums. TOTAL BUMS! He has a bum resume.

Even Daniel Martz is a better name than ANYTHING what Browne fought in his whole career apart from Chagaev.

And let us not forget that Browne fought only one fight in two years before facing Whyte. Also one year off before fighting Whyte. Completly worthless a win vs such a version of Lucas Browne. Lucas Browne always looked amateurish and average (he is a nice person btw) but he looked not even like a TOp 100 hw vs Whyte and this not because Whyte was soooooo good or sooooo sharp.

 

Whats BS?
Many fighters on good runs lose soon after following their first defeat. Take J Toney who was a P4P fighter and after losing to Jones lost his next fight to a fighter who hadnt had 20 fights and often get stopped after. Thats just one example of many.
Ortiz beating thompson whos last 5 fights were 2-3 before facing Ortiz is a win you are rating yet one of those losses was to a fighter that undefeated Brown beat. That shows whos talking BS there and who is struggling with the facts I am producing
Scott as you note had 2 wins before the loss so had a recent loss. He was 3-2 in his last 5 fights whereas Brown was undefeated and Scott had lost to Chisora who Whyte holds a win over also
You tied yourself up again lol

 

You can not mention only some numbers without mentioning the names of the opponents. THIS IS BULL****. Pure Bull****.

If we take into account the last five fights before they faced Ortiz/Whyte

Malik Scott: 3-2 (losses vs Deontay Wilder/Dereck Chisora)
Tony Thompson: 2-3 (losses vs Malik Scott/Carlos Takam/Kubrat Pulev)
Bryant Jennings: 4-1 (loss vs Wlad Klitschko)

So i am talking bull**** if i write that those names fought the elite? LMAO
Ortiz did better vs Scott/Thompson/Jennings then the whole elite. This is a fact.

Browne was 25-0 before facing Whyte. WOOOOOOW

His last five opponents before fighting Whyte:
Matthew Greer 16-20-0
Ruslan Chagaev 34-2-1 LUCKY PUNCH KNOCKOUT, behind on the cards still a good win no doubt
Julius Long 16-18-0
Chaunchy Welliver 55-8-5
Andriy Rudenko 24-0-0

Rudenko and especially Chagaev are legit wins, i forgot about Rudenko last time but apart from those two names Browne did not face any single opponent who has a decent resume or a decent history.

Browne also was inactive quite a long time before fighting Whyte. You can not rule this out, you must have take this into account if you want to value a win or not.

If a guy who is in his late 30s is only fighting one fight in two years and then facing a legit Top 10/12 HW who is active, fights a lot, you can not forget about that if you want to evaluate about the win.

 

Whether you think Whyte would win or lose is irrelevant, fact is he is the no 1 so should be getting the next shot...

In reality after Vitali the WBC won't be letting the belt leave America any time soon..

 

The WBC are a disgrace.

 

It's the WBC, are we surprised?

For the vacant WBC belt at Welterweight they're enforcing Garcia v Porter (Number 1 v 2)

Yet they're picking Breazeale as Heavyweight mandatory (Number 2)

The belt cannot leave the US!

 

Whyte >>>> Breazeale.

Both in a h2h sense and in terms of deserving a title shot.

 

Ortiz will beat the hell of whyte!

 

Are all the same people that said Browne would knock out Whyte now saying that Ortiz will beat him .
This is a different Whyte than we saw in the past

 

Nope. Whyte will be the best that Ortiz has fought imo and Ortiz at this stage is gonna fall short

 

I'm being serious when I say this, Whyte has the potential to beat Wilder and Joshua Imo

 

I posted a long time ago that Wilder would fight Breazeale, Haymon made Breazeale mandatory even though he wasn't, as I have always said, it's the promoter who ranks the fighters..................Haymon owns Breazeale, Joshua knocked Breazeale easily, he can't fight at all that makes him the perfect fight for Wilder. Stevenson hasn't fought a mandatory in over a hundred years!

 

Totally agree,it’s taken him a while,a few years infact but now his left shoulders sorted he’s a real handful for anyone and at some point he’s gonna hurt you.

 

No wonder Canelo felt wronged by the WBC watching Wilder and Stevenson get away with years of fighting duffers