Crawford's resume grows more suspect

You mean this Walters:

 

You didn't answer my question. I asked for 5. 'Make the case for some others'... so basically you already rate Crawford top 5, yet state a win over Horn still won't place him there. Your agenda is clear.

No argument can be made for Canelo and GGG being above Crawford p4p. None whatsoever. Loma has the strongest case but still falls short.

 

Another banned alt clown.

I'd underrated Loma up til that point because of the Salido loss, and Walters was clearly not himself that night, and hasn't fought since. That win was extremely fishy. Wouldn't be surprised if he took a retirement cheque from Bob.

 

This Rigo:

 

No. Just doing my research. Getting personal won't help you. .

You wrote them not me.

 

Man is this the best form of entertainment you can come up with for yourself on a Sunday? Digging through other posters old posts?

What was your banned account(s) called?

 

Do you understand the concept of p4p?

Rigo is a much smaller man than Loma.

 

Anyway my work here is done.

Crawford resume > Lomachenko and no amount of salivating EE fanboys is gonna change facts from being facts.

 

Second best. I've had 3 wanks already

 

1 over GGG and 2 over Loma?

 

Agree. Bud will be exposed when he steps in with the likes of Spence or other top talent.

 

Yes, do you understand 'fail'?

 

No, ghetto gaggers all 3. I'm rinsed...

 

Yeh I've read a few of your posts

 

No argument for GGG and Canelo above Crawford...GTFO

YOUR agenda is clear. You’re a total nuthugger!!!

Top 5 MAX for Crawford. My point is: howcome you can have him at #1?!?