Reading between the lines he may have. He's sure as shyte not after something based on historical value.
He did not mention it "prime vs prime"... And "Greatest match" can be perfectly interpreted by the part of historical repercussion. so do not be stubborn
AND WE SHALL NOT HAVE ANY HUMOR ON THIS WEBSITE. I jokingly responded to an earlier post. If you don’t want to read it, you can skip it or block me. Again. Lighten up, Francis.
This. By far the biggest fight ever, dwarfing the Super Bowl and World Series. The basically stood still for this fight. Add in it lived up to its billing and it cannot be topped.
Yes, you're right, of course - clearly it was JT being stubborn. Was he also being pedantic and unnecessarily negative about other people's posts?
Humour is one thing this is another,references to fictional characters have no place here and denigrate the OP's intention to provide a topic for serious discussion.It's also pretty childish. No intention of blocking you, I like a lot of your content, just not when you have your silly hat on.Gertrude.
You should be left locked in a room with a loaded pistol ,whilst your fellow posters wait attentively and with rapt anticipation for the loud report of a, [hopefully fatal,] gunshot!
10 years and 4 months isn't nearly 11 years? News flash, fictional film characters aren't real boxers, I'd expect everybody else to know this but you? WTFK's?
Try to stay on topic: Balboa vs. Creed is NOT a prime-vs.-prime matchup; Balboa vs. Lang I definitely is. I value your input on the topic.