Successful fighters with the worst reflexes?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mrkoolkevin, May 1, 2018.


  1. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,578
    Nov 24, 2005
    You can't be a good fighter with poor reflexes.
    It's impossible.
     
    Clinton and greynotsoold like this.
  2. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,636
    Mar 17, 2010
    I was thinking the same thing.
    It's a true mind bender.
     
  3. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,578
    Jan 30, 2014
    Some fighters clearly have much worse reflexes than others. And some of these guys were able to achieve notable successes in the sport despite their physical limitations (durability, stamina, and power help). I’m interested in the names of those fighters.
     
  4. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,578
    Nov 24, 2005
    How do you measure a fighter's reflexes ?
     
  5. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,578
    Jan 30, 2014
    Easiest way is probably to watch them fight and see how they react to incoming punches. Actually, I suppose you can watch how they react to any kind of movement, really.
     
  6. Jel

    Jel Obsessive list maker Full Member

    7,831
    13,124
    Oct 20, 2017
    George Foreman
     
  7. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,578
    Nov 24, 2005
    Fighters can just walk into punches because they lack skill, lack flexibility/agility. Reacting to incoming punches is a matter for judging their defence, not their reflexes.

    A reflex is an unconscious reaction. Sure, sometimes you can see an action that must be reflex, but you'd have to be superhuman to be able to see all relexes and gauge the speed.

    You can't be a good fighter with clearly worse reflexes. A fighter with clearly worse reflexes would have something like a 100% loss record.
     
  8. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,813
    44,474
    Apr 27, 2005
    I bet you're the life of the party mate :D

    I think we can make a decent bit of a judgement. Guys with fantastic reflexes simply aren't going to be getting hit non stop or never reacting to incoming punches.

    It's blatantly obvious guys like Benitez and Jones have surreal reflexes. Greg Page is another that relied on reflexes for his defence more so than good fundamentals. Ali's reflexes were extraordinary. It's pretty safe to say these guys had better reflexes than the likes of Bazooka Limon, Tex Cobb and George Foreman.
     
    Clinton and mrkoolkevin like this.
  9. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,578
    Nov 24, 2005
    Guys who are geting hit non stop and never reacting to incoming punches aren't going to be good fighters. That's what I said.

    Guys who are getting hit non stop and never reacting to incoming punches are going to be knocked out.
    All the ****ing time. Or thereabouts.
     
  10. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,578
    Jan 30, 2014
    I think the common colloquial usage of the term “reflexes” in athletic contexts is broader than the formal definition of reflexes as unconscious/automatic reaction to stimuli. In sports, the term generally refers to one’s reaction time with respect to physical stimuli (a boxer reacting to a punch, a basketball defender reacting to a crossover, a cornerback reacting to a wide receiver’s route, a base runner reacting to a pickoff attempt, etc.). It’s sort of a combination of recognition and response. At least that’s always been my intuitive understanding. So I disagree that it’s as hard to discern as you suggest (at the extremes, anyway) or that slower reflexes are necessarily fatal for a fighter.
     
    Last edited: May 5, 2018
    Hannibal Barca likes this.
  11. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,813
    44,474
    Apr 27, 2005
    You implied fighters getting hit all the time need not be devoid of excellent reflexes. I would disagree.
     
  12. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,578
    Jan 30, 2014
    Yeah, getting hit nonstop and never reacting to incoming punches would be very bad. Seems like an extreme scenario though. But even guys with poor reflexes can try to overwhelm their opponents, wear them down, avoid their punches with their guards and head movement, or even time them, etc.
     
    Last edited: May 5, 2018
  13. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,578
    Nov 24, 2005
    Slipping punches is a skill.
    We call it defensive skill.

    People or boxers without the skill might well react to the punch in ways we don't like, as fans of boxing skill, especially if they are tough determined boxers coming forward, but that doesn't mean they didn't react.

    Fighters who don't have the reflexes to react tend to get sparked out and we aren't discussing them
     
  14. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,578
    Nov 24, 2005
    I didn't say all the time.

    But anyway : reacting to incoming punches and avoiding incoming punches are two different things. Avoiding the punches is defensive skill.

    Clearly worse reflexes would result in getting knocked out.
     
  15. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,813
    44,474
    Apr 27, 2005
    Worse reflexes would result in avoiding less punches.