"Canelo is somewhat apprehensive when first introduced to new situations. Given time to warm up, he becomes more interactive and enjoys attention. Canelo is neutered and up to date on his shots." http://www.thedailyworld.com/life/pet-of-the-week-canelo/
He didn't let Canelo punch him lol, Canelo dropped down, so it confused Golovkin, that's why he froze for a second, he never saw that from Canelo before. Don't be stupid.
That's the level of denial we are dealing with from the Golovkin fanbase. It's on full display when you post those clips, the Triple G brigade goes immediately into "spin mode" and it's hilarious. He says "Great clips" but you know internally he's going "**** he posted a clip, now I gotta figure out how I can explain this without making it sound like Golovkin was getting lit up" . In his mind those aren't "Great clips" in his mind those clips are what Golovkin fans have been trying so hard to supress and pretend didn't happen since September lmao.
One critical flaw Canelo and Lemieux have is that they would lean on the lead leg before committing to anything. Golovkin read through that easily. Lemieux god jabbed to death and Alvarez managed to adapt a bit.
Feints, punches in bunches,angle and footwork, an active guard to slow his offense down, inside fighting. Focus on the body more than the head. Uppercuts are a must, as Alvarez used them brilliantly to counter Golovkin and keep Golovkin from going to his body. Basically everything has to be on point.
Birmingham it wasn't a rhetorical question, I really do not Know/understand why GGG did not take away his heart & lungs, bit weak I know. The counter , well I feel/felt that GGG was not troubled by any of canelos shots at all, apart from the accumulation of possible points ,but, again with GGG fights this is not usually a consideration. You may be correct who knows ,only Able & GGG I guess ?
At least you admit your response is weak. You have no answers, and no way to explain what happened since you refuse to admt the truth out of pride and G fanboyism. You are left speechless as to why G was so ineffective. Of course Birmingham is correct, it's because it's blatantly obvious common sense. It's because Birmingham doesn't have an agenda to defend Golovkin at all costs like you do. "only Able and GGG" know you guess? LOL who do you think you're fooling. Wake up and smell the fricken coffee. Open your eyes !
I would if I could . GGG of a few year ago would've layed them hooks in to his body naturally, its his style. He's had to change stuff as his slowed, take less chances
maybe, possibly, but Canelo had a lot to do with Golovkin turning old overnight. After tonight I wouldn't be surprised if Golovkin looks to be in prime form again. Frankly I don't think we got the best versions of Canelo or Golovkin last September. But any version of Golovkin would surely have to think twice about trying to go to the body on Canelo. The reasons are Canelo's counting punching ability, Canelo's upper body movement, and just geometrically Canelo's body is a smaller target than some of the opponents G has fought in the past that are taller and it's just easier to find the body. Even with a good boxer like Jacobs, with Jacobs height and frame there's more area for G to actually land body punches. All these things factor in to why G didn't go to the body. But overall it's mostly just Canelo's speed in general, his elusiveness and blocking ability.
Ha ha ha Oh & nothing to do with his juicing...you cretinous little blood clat...go wash ya brain fool
until someone can at least rock him you have to say no one is going to stand in front of Golovkin 12 rounds and survive, much less beat him. best strategy is to train your bicycle, which is what Jacobs, Cownelo and Saunders have all been doing.