Vanes wasn't coming up in weight after a 2 year layoff against lara or Charlo. He was prime and in Charlos case he was still prettty young when he beat vanes.
LOOOOl charlo and lara were in their prime and struggled with vanes GGG is close to 40 and beat him without even trying lara and charlo would of went 12 rounds with vanes yesterday at the very least
Mayweaether was 41 when he won every round against a Canelo who didn't gas out half way through the fight from carrying too much weight. This is why FM is on the 100 list and why GGG is hovering somewhere aroung 850-900
No way if vanes was to fight Jacobs next he would get him to 12 rounds The proof is also in his past fights with charlo and lara 2 fights he should of won and he also dropped Andrade good.
well their is argument to be had about it and im not saying its a sure fire but I really think there is argument for that
GGG did take a lot of hard punches against Canelo. Moreso than he ever had before. I wouldn't be the least surprised if he wasn't the same fighter after that fight.
Vanes would ko wade. I think Trout v Vanes at MW would be a tight fight. Winner vs Andrade for a shot at BJS.
Charlo is much better now than when he fought vanes. He wasnt sparring with spence back then. They both have helped each other. Only a fool would think the version of charlo who beat vanes is worse than this version.
It makes no sense to even talk about that Charlo, he is not the one who would be fighting GGG anyways. Its the other Charlo.
Curious about this 100 to 900 list. Are you claiming there has been 100 fighters that were greater than fmj? Wouldn't expect anything less from you