How often did late 1800s/early 1900s fight people see the greats of their eras?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mrkoolkevin, May 5, 2018.


  1. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,588
    Jan 30, 2014
    In the late 19th century and early 20th century, before high-quality video and convenient mass transportation were widely accessible, how often did fight people (boxers and trainers in particular, but also writers and pundits) actually see the greats of their eras fight? When contemporary writers and fighters wax eloquently about the greats of their bygone eras many years later, how many of their fights had they actually watched, and how many times? Do we have any indications of this? I know this is a strange, broad question but any insights would be greatly appreciated.
     
    Last edited: Nov 22, 2019
  2. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,639
    Mar 17, 2010
    It seems like there was a strong effort for boxers at the time to expose themselves to the best of the sport.

    Willard for instance was immediately recognized as a talent, and so he was recruited to Carl Morris’ camp. Camps would travel around the country for fights and would participate in other training camps with great fighters so there was a pretty decent amount of exposure.

    Jess Willard and Jack Johnson trained together when Johnson was champion. Jess also sparred with Fulton, and other big names.

    If you were serious about boxing at the time, I don’t think you were averse to hopping on the train to go to where you need to be for the action.
     
  3. BitPlayerVesti

    BitPlayerVesti Boxing Drunkie Full Member

    8,584
    11,099
    Oct 28, 2017
    I think that's why they had so many fights against random nobodies, people would be happy just to see a great boxer box, even if it was against a no-one, plus exhibitions etc. With the legal situation meaning locations were often secret and it being harder to travel too.
     
  4. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,588
    Jan 30, 2014
    Thanks, I'm sure that the sparring was important for the spread of ideas and information, and in helping fighters get impressions of each other’s abilities. But what I really wonder is how many times these guys actually saw each other in actual real fights, especially against top notch opponents. How many championship fights did someone like Sam Langford get to watch in his lifetime? Or even someone like Nat Fleischer--how many times did he actually see Jack Johnson, Dempsey, Tunney, or their top contemporaries fight live?
     
    Last edited: May 5, 2018
    PhillyPhan69 likes this.
  5. Senya13

    Senya13 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,973
    2,419
    Jul 11, 2005
    Many people attended heavyweight championship fights wherever they were held. A lot of top fighters were traveling around the states giving exhibitions and meeting all comers (including visiting small towns). Many sporting writers were exchanging mails with others writers/managers/boxers/sporting people in general, on a regular basis, in addition to reading all the wire reports (which were pretty detailed for big fights).
     
    Mendoza, louis54 and mrkoolkevin like this.
  6. Fergy

    Fergy Walking Dead Full Member

    30,346
    37,318
    Jan 8, 2017
    Can you imagine how mind blowing it would feel ,if you had a distant ancestor that had actually being in the crowd to watch a Dempsey or Johnson fight?
    Even more so an important one such as Dempsey v Willard or Johnson v Jeffries ?
    Happy to have that link to history but gutted because great grand pa Fred was no longer around to tell you first hand stories !
     
    PhillyPhan69 likes this.
  7. Boilermaker

    Boilermaker Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,372
    473
    Oct 6, 2004
    My Grandmother (actually it may have been great Grandmother) was at Johnson v Burns. Quite interesting, because according to Klompton (usually right) there were no females allowed. So i am not sure if there is a bit of fibbing involved but it was a family story when i was young.
     
  8. Fergy

    Fergy Walking Dead Full Member

    30,346
    37,318
    Jan 8, 2017
    Very
    Very interesting story. Who knows ?

    She may have being there ,perhaps the record s of no women were wrong .Makes you wonder with a story like that passed down, how it first came about ?
    Nice little interesting nugget though Boilermaker .
     
  9. edward morbius

    edward morbius Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,986
    1,266
    Sep 5, 2011
    I recall Dan Daniel of The Ring magazine writing an article on Jack Dempsey in which he designated Dempsey the greatest he had seen. In the article he commented that he had only seen Dempsey live once, against Willard.

    Now I suppose he might have watched the same films we watch today, but "live" and "at ringside" just the Willard fight.

    While Daniel was a mainstay at The Ring, it seems he was primarily a baseball writer.

    Tom Meany, another top sportswriter of the era, mentioned in his autobiography that he never saw Dempsey and Tunney at all, but had seen Louis.
     
    PhillyPhan69 and cross_trainer like this.
  10. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,583
    Nov 24, 2005
    I shall confess right here I've only seen most greats of my lifetime on the television/internet etc.
     
  11. Dubblechin

    Dubblechin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,786
    18,733
    Jun 25, 2014
    About as often as they saw their presidents in person.

    Maybe once in their lifetimes, if they were lucky. Otherwise, never.

    Not until fights were filmed and distributed to movie houses ... which wasn't often.

    Unless you lived in a fight town and had disposable income, you probably only saw a champ if he appeared at something like a State Fair signing autographs or going a round or two with a boxer he traveled with or some local guy.
     
    Seamus and KasimirKid like this.
  12. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,588
    Jan 30, 2014
    Sure, that makes sense wrt the general public but does that hold true for the other top level boxers and trainers too?
     
  13. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,588
    Jan 30, 2014
    Thanks, this is a very interesting tidbit. But would Daniel actually have had access to film on Dempsey (and even earlier fighters)? It’s just fascinating to me that the perceptions and rankings of pre-1930s heavyweights by even prominent fight people were likely heavily shaped by second-hand written accounts (and perhaps, folklore) with relatively limited direct observations.
     
  14. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,583
    Nov 24, 2005
    Obviously not. A top level boxer is far more likely to come into contact with a "great boxer of his era". He might even fight one, or several.