More Ridiculous Theory: Vanes hurt Golovkin or Brook exposed Golovkin?

You sound insecure

 

If Canelo fans are hanging hats on what I saw against Vanes then the are grasping at straws.

If there is a GGG/Canelo rematch, then Canelo should be drug tested regularly, have his hands wrapped legally and then we will see a real difference.

Canelo got beat (we know what we saw) last time by a man Canelo fans said was "past it, old and had never fought anybody".

Add to that Canelo might have been juiced up then it isn't looking good for a clean Canelo in a rematch.

This is the reason they will fight Spike in September and want Golovkin next May, Golovkin wasn't old enough last time and they won't risk it again any time soon.

They want Golovkin to add an extra G to his name for "Grandad" then they will feel brave enough.

 

I don't really care about this topic.

 

Brook had a decent fight until he got stopped.

Vanes in no way hurt GGG.

So, the Vanes theory is more ridiculous.

 

Be honest, its your life on here.... You, Dino, mvc, ect, love a good GGG thread, keeps you alive

 

You've been posting about me a lot today. My posts seem to turn people into obsessed fanatical stalkers. You don't want to become one of those losers , do you?

 

Guy's can't wait to come on and be the first one to claim somebody was "exposed"

 

Vanes hurt GGG so bad he got knocked the F out a minute later lol

 

I know I know, I must stop talking about you, its getting ridiculous isn't it. Can I ask you, whats with the Rick Astley pic in your profile ???? I'd imagine you absolutely despise him

 

Rick Astley never did no harm to anybody

 

your never gonna give him up

Now are you