BRONER vs LOMO at 135 would have been great

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by at1, May 13, 2018.


  1. at1

    at1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,540
    15
    Sep 26, 2004
    Broner would have given him
    Problems at 135 which was broner a best weight ... it’s crazy people forget how great broner was ....
     
    CutThroatFade likes this.
  2. lepinthehood

    lepinthehood When I'm drinking you leave me well alone banned Full Member

    52,105
    23,327
    Aug 27, 2011
    great broner was? lol
     
    RingKing75 and Willie Maeket like this.
  3. Tomato(e) Can

    Tomato(e) Can Emmanuel Dapidran Pacquiao. banned Full Member

    6,300
    5,643
    Feb 19, 2018
    Broner and great do not belong in the same sentence. You deserve a 48-72 hour ban.

    :deal:
     
  4. at1

    at1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,540
    15
    Sep 26, 2004
    He damn sure was better than salido lol he ran through demarco he was a killer at 135
     
  5. at1

    at1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,540
    15
    Sep 26, 2004
    He’s 5’7 just like lomo he didn’t start losing until he took his body up to 140 plus
     
    Willie Maeket likes this.
  6. kirk

    kirk l l l Staff Member

    70,916
    27,398
    Jul 26, 2004
    Broner would do ok for about 2 rounds and then proceed to get absolutely dismantled.
     
    RingKing75, shoe, Birmingham and 3 others like this.
  7. ClassicRon

    ClassicRon Member Full Member

    394
    223
    Nov 25, 2016
    Broner was definitely a killer at the lower weight classes but was just a result of bullying smaller framed guys honestly.
     
  8. CutThroatFade

    CutThroatFade Rangers FC Full Member

    17,951
    28,996
    May 25, 2015
    If Broner lands it’s over.
     
    at1 likes this.
  9. at1

    at1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,540
    15
    Sep 26, 2004
    Right he’s 5’7 just like lomo and fought some flat out dogs at higher weights he’s went as high as 147 ... think if he just stayed at 135? He was such a puncher at 135
     
  10. at1

    at1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,540
    15
    Sep 26, 2004
    That argument can be made for lomo to broners destruction of demarco was more impressive than lomo vs Linares to me
     
  11. Jim Jeffries

    Jim Jeffries Ring General banned Full Member

    3,265
    571
    Feb 24, 2013
    He knocked down Porter with a good shot. Adrien ''The Problem'' Broner's problem is he doesn't let his hands go enough and is comfortable being a poor copy of Floyd with the shoulder roll stuff.
     
    at1 likes this.
  12. vnyc

    vnyc Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    7,078
    638
    Nov 8, 2009
    Broner was great hahaha lol, no he was just a weight bully
     
  13. at1

    at1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,540
    15
    Sep 26, 2004
    How can you say that lol he was a dog bro let’s be honest here how would lomo do vs Marco midana at 147 ? Broner went all the way to 147 on a 5’7 frame and faced real puncher and went 12....
     
  14. at1

    at1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,540
    15
    Sep 26, 2004
    He’s to damn small for the higher wheights floyd let his hands go less as he went up all fighters do ... he’s 5’7 just like lomo and demarco is a bigger puncher than Linares
     
    Jim Jeffries likes this.
  15. Jim Jeffries

    Jim Jeffries Ring General banned Full Member

    3,265
    571
    Feb 24, 2013
    I agree he should've never gone past 140 lbs. He's not as bad as people make out.

    When he let's his hands go he looks impressive. It's just he looks poor with the ineffective shoulder roll copy he does and boxers take advantage of it. He gets lazy