BRONER vs LOMO at 135 would have been great

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by at1, May 13, 2018.


  1. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,562
    May 4, 2017
    No, Broner would have to prove he can beat Linares first, he isn`t a smart figter and doesn`t have the reach advantage Linares exploited with his great hand speed yesterday, plus Broner doesn`t have the body attack that Linares used a number of times v Loma, no, Loma slaps him around.
     
  2. miniq

    miniq AJ IS A BODYBUILDING BUM Full Member

    47,861
    27,821
    Oct 23, 2011
    Loma kills Broner

    Broner does not have the workrrate or footwork to deal with him

    Broner lost to PDL & Quintero...
     
  3. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,562
    May 4, 2017
    How do you think Salido would of done vs Linares in MSG then, fighters improve.
     
  4. at1

    at1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,540
    15
    Sep 26, 2004
    Ask Linares about demarco ..... you see what broner did to demarco Linares has demarco problems
     
  5. at1

    at1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,540
    15
    Sep 26, 2004
    Broner would have stopped salido at 135
     
  6. at1

    at1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,540
    15
    Sep 26, 2004
    I don’t even think lomo could beat jmm at 135 watch jmm vs a fresh salido
     
  7. hoopsman

    hoopsman Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,528
    2,155
    Jul 24, 2005
    Broner is much too inactive (in the ring), stationary, and predictable offensively.

    Lomachenko would outpoint Broner with relative ease.
     
    shoe and RealDeal like this.
  8. kirk

    kirk l l l Staff Member

    71,036
    27,681
    Jul 26, 2004
    I like Broner actually... but hes simply not smart enough, nor has the style, to handle Loma. Honestly after a couple rounds he would start to freeze up due to the speed, activity and lack of having a target. He would get outclassed.
     
    Last edited: May 13, 2018
    RealDeal likes this.
  9. shoe

    shoe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,560
    563
    Dec 2, 2013
    You want someone to beat Loma at lightweight you’d better go back to Roberto Duran.
     
  10. RealDeal

    RealDeal Pugilist Specialist Full Member

    1,689
    1,829
    May 2, 2009
    Why do people keep saying Lomo instead of Loma? Am I missing the joke or something?
     
  11. Reg

    Reg Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,374
    6,927
    Feb 5, 2016
    Brandon Rios and Robert Gurrero were very good at 135 as well. They both went up to 147 and fought far stiffer competition than Broner has dared to face. How many times have you hyped them in the past like you do Broner?
     
  12. vast

    vast Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,988
    19,884
    Nov 27, 2010
    Broner.....LOL. The dudes a B level fighter. Paulie gave him hell....LMAO
     
  13. RingKing75

    RingKing75 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,037
    5,148
    Dec 23, 2013
    Broners garbage. Get over it.
     
  14. lefthook89

    lefthook89 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,569
    82
    Sep 28, 2009
    Lol Loma would WAX Broner even on his best night. With Broner's poor footwork he would be getting turned like a dreidel all night. Loma TKO 6
     
  15. Kingmaffe

    Kingmaffe Active Member Full Member

    517
    576
    Jul 22, 2017
    Broner WAS a killer at the lower weigh classes, but his lack of discipline is catching up on him fast! Going up in weight between fights will make a fighter burn out, and his punch output was never that great to begin with.

    Lomachenko would be all wrong for him. Southpaw, amazing output, IQ, skills. I believe Broner is more powerful and has a better chin, but this means nothing when Loma would be outlanding him 3 to 1. Could even see Broner quitting from sheer humiliation.
     
    lefthook89 likes this.