Fastest ever 3-division champion (Lomachenko)

You are a hater of Lomachenko clearly, you claimed that he was ducking Walters and picked Rigo to beat him, and after the fight you downplayed his win against the Cuban. You also like to talk about white privilege and other non existing BS (fighters like Golovkin, Kovalev or Lomachenko clearly didn't enjoy any privileges in the USA against North American boxers) so I thought for a good reason that you were telling me your own opinion.

 

The Salido lowblows contain a grain of truth but are exaggerated. He didn't hit him low 40 times. Lomachenko wouldn't be able to stand if he did that. 1 or 2 is probably fairer with most of the rest on the beltline.

There's no way the Russell fight was a draw. Lomachenko dominated 9-3 or 8-4 if I recall.

The Linares fight judging was spot on accurate. Some of you guys just can't see when your hero get's his punches blocked or when other people hit him cleanly. That **** was dead even. If you didn't give Linares four rounds you weren't being objective. Some of the rounds were tight, but when you gave them all to Lomachenko that shows an obvious bias.

 

You are mad that I am not gargling Loma's balls like you are. I'm not into that gay fanboy worship **** like your ***** arse. You aren't allowed to mention Kovalev. He talked ****, then got punked by J Prince, then punked by Ward in the ring. Ward hit Kovalev with a hard body shot, and Kovalev turned around and bent over like he was offering up his arse. Hurt the hearts of many a racist boxing fan the night Ward turned Kovalev into his *****. I often give Lomachenko props, credit, and discuss his high level skill. I'll never ball gobble like you though. I'm also objective. I'm not gonna rave over a victory when a guy is two weight classes smaller, and three or four inches shorter. Or hype of a W over a guy who was on the shelf for a year while in a monetary dispute with his promoter.

 

That was not the point. If Lomachenko enjoyed "privileges" like ****bar One claimed then the ref would have disqualified Salido or at least Loma would have won on cards, no judge would have scored the Russell fight a draw and he would have been leading on scorecards against Linares. These things simply didn't happen. So Lomachenko does not enjoy privileges. Period.

 

Kovalev beat Ward in the first fight according to 73% of all boxing experts and got robbed on cards. I know it hurts but it was your boy who enjoyed privileges. So **** your theory.

 

That's not the point. Of course Loma is a special fighter. The point is, when you overrate a fighter, your comments will be met with counter arguments, it doesn't mean the person voicing their opinion is a hater simply for stating something more centered than saying that after losing to Salido, beating a 39 year old bantamweight, and beating a good but not great LW makes Loma an ATG fighter.

 

"Counter arguments":

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DdLHh8-U8AAUecf.jpg

 

Does that one person post here and make those threads here?

 

I get what you're saying, but you left two solid wins out there. The Russel Jr. win and the Walters win.

 

Thankfully these type of morons got banned lately. So they now pollute the scene.

 

Doesn't hurt me what you think either way. If you were more of a legit poster, and not a troll half the time, you would realize that I'm not a Ward guy. I had no stake in the Ward vs Kovalev fights period.

 

Never saw them.

 

It's not just what I think. It's boxing's consensus, sorry to burst your bubble. I guess these people must be trolls as well.

http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/Andre_Ward_vs._Sergey_Kovalev_(1st_meeting)

 

Lol, you never saw Nay_sayer, cereal monotony, Uppercut_artist etc.? Sure buddy.

 

He probably liked some of their posts before.