Jack gets jobbed, once again. What a joke boxing has become.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by MVC!, May 20, 2018.


  1. Max Thunder

    Max Thunder Proud member of the Cult of Vikings Full Member

    6,993
    11,630
    Apr 25, 2017
    Said that the judges aren't fair to him because they hate Floyd.
     
  2. Tomato(e) Can

    Tomato(e) Can Emmanuel Dapidran Pacquiao. banned Full Member

    6,300
    5,643
    Feb 19, 2018
    This content is protected
    he
    This content is protected
    edical
    This content is protected
    eam.

    :deal:
     
    Bustajay likes this.
  3. youppi

    youppi New Member banned Full Member

    84
    50
    May 9, 2018
    wasn't a robbery jack gave away the first half of the fight
     
  4. MVC!

    MVC! The Best Ever Full Member

    60,123
    5,606
    Nov 5, 2013
    And it's probably true lol. This was bull****
     
  5. Sammy123

    Sammy123 Money Maker Staff Member

    2,749
    1,915
    Apr 15, 2015
    This was entirely Jack's fault.

    He started the fight from the 7th round. He did nothing the first 6, so the judges gave it to Stevenson on activity alone.

    The 2nd half of the fight all 3 judges had Jack dominating. So they were doing their job.

    Jack threw away this fight because he deliberately gave away the first half. Because they thought they would stop Stevenson in the 2nd half (which they almost did).

    So who's at fault here? It's Jack and his team. If he fought to win at least one or two of those initial rounds, he'd have walked away with the Champion.

    So stop claiming corruption and blaming everything else BUT Jack and his team for a flawed gameplan.

    Now he has a problem with the second fight. Stevenson knows he can hurt Jack to the body, so that's where his focus will be in a second fight. Nobody to blame but Jack and his team for throwing this opportunity away.
     
    Bustajay, 305th and Ph33rknot like this.
  6. MVC!

    MVC! The Best Ever Full Member

    60,123
    5,606
    Nov 5, 2013
    Boxing politics at its finest, Jack won this fight 115-113 to anyone who actually factors in the 4 categories of scoring.
     
  7. TheDon!

    TheDon! Vamos Campeon banned Full Member

    427
    356
    May 13, 2017
    So you go against your fellow Canadian Stevenson and go with Jack just because he's part of your idol Sinclairs TMT lol
     
  8. rapscalion

    rapscalion Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,849
    761
    Oct 7, 2010
    It's cause the judges don't like mayweather doe :loel:
     
  9. Work the body

    Work the body Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,220
    2,308
    Apr 5, 2015
    I agree I thought Jack won. Close but clear IMO. Same as against DeGale.
     
  10. MVC!

    MVC! The Best Ever Full Member

    60,123
    5,606
    Nov 5, 2013
    Yeah... that's why most people can't score!

    It's like the stock market. There's a reason why "most people" don't get rich , only very few actually make it big.
     
  11. MVC!

    MVC! The Best Ever Full Member

    60,123
    5,606
    Nov 5, 2013
    That's one of the reasons, yes. Anyone who disagrees is ignorant or just trying to troll.
     
  12. MrTombourineMan

    MrTombourineMan Торрейра хорошо. Full Member

    1,145
    2,062
    Apr 16, 2016
    So this judge can score a fight, but the other two judges that differed by a single round are clueless? There's simply no grey area with you, is there?

    I thought Jack won, by a point*. But you can't throw sweet **** all for the first half of the fight, lose concentration and nearly get stooped in the tenth and then be pissy about a draw, and by no means should such a result count as a robbery in a fight that close.

    *My Scorecard (Stevenson-Jack):
    10-10
    10-9 20-19 Stevenson
    10-9 30-28 Stevenson
    9-10 39-38 Stevenson
    10-9 49-47 Stevenson
    10-9 59-56 Stevenson
    9-10 68-66 Stevenson
    9-10 77-76 Stevenson
    9-10 86-86 Draw
    10-9 96-65 Stevenson
    9-10 105-105 Draw
    9-10 114-115 Jack.

    The draw was fair, get over it.
     
  13. f1ght3rz

    f1ght3rz Ronaldoooo is crying in his caaaaaar Full Member

    17,693
    21,284
    Jan 31, 2018
    lmao
    using the word "robbery" inflationary doesn't make it more true.
    the fight was close, a draw is a fair result.
    you can score it 7-5/6-6/5-7.
    There were a lot of close rounds.
    I think Stevenson should have won, but i can live with the draw, a Jack win would be also okay.
     
    MrTombourineMan likes this.
  14. MVC!

    MVC! The Best Ever Full Member

    60,123
    5,606
    Nov 5, 2013
    No, it really wasn't fair. Even Jack knows there's corruption, he mentioned it in the post fight press conference.

    Everyone knows it's true, they just turn a blind eye to it.

    The fact of the matter is: Any legitimate scoring would have Jack the winner here, 115-113. Ask yourself this. Did you factor in defense while scoring? If the answer is no, your card is not legitimate.
     
  15. MVC!

    MVC! The Best Ever Full Member

    60,123
    5,606
    Nov 5, 2013
    And yes you can btw, Willie Pep landed 0 punches against Jackie Graves in their 1946 confrontation and he won a round, landing 0 punches.

    That's what boxing is about. Defense should always be taken into consideration, HUGE consideration while scoring any kind of fight.

    This is why I say most people can't score, they don't factor in defense.