Jack gets jobbed, once again. What a joke boxing has become.

LOL explain the factor "defense"

is it head movement, upper body movement in general, movement in general, a high guard, running away from the punches...

define it.

defense is a side factor, not a factor that decides a fight.

 

You are a gullible fanboy idiot if you really believe that

 

RObbery lmao, it was a close fight . Jack was dumb by giving away the first half of the fight. Stevenson won the first 5 rnds cause jack didn’t do ****. That means he had to fight a flawless fight the rest of the 2nd half. Which he didn’t do. Stevenson won 1 or 2 more rnds in the later half making it a draw or a Steven win.

No complaint on the result. I’ve seen robbery and this ain’t it.

I personally had it for Jack by a rnd but I hate Stevenson so I could have been a little bias on a close rnd.

 

No, it isn't.

You can factor defense as a deciding factor if a round is really close then you might give the round to a fighter who is moving better, using footwork to get out or moving the upper body to avoid getting hit. But if a boxer is connecting clean, hard and more then you can not give a round to the opponent who is moving better or avoiding some shots. This is bs!

Oh dear...my scorecards are far away from being perfect but most of the time they are good/close enough to the judges or to the rest. So please stop writing as you are the god of scoring fights.

Your scorecards are biased as mine and perfect as mine and invalid as mine.

You have topic full of users telling you that it was a close fight and a draw is okay as a result BUT YOU ARE STILL NOT BELIEVING ANYONE here because you are the god of scoring fights.

Arrogant *****.

 

hahahahahaa, you are the best scorer of the site, i have to laugh my ass off. You are as good as the rest. Biased on your preferences and your likes/dislikes. What you are have seen and so on. Nobody is perfect but you are definitely not better than most of the regular scoring guys here. This is big bs.

I never denied that DEFENSE isn't a factor BUT you wrote it on yourself: Defense is ONE factor. Not THE factor.

 

I think i have more knowledge than you. You are a mouth hero. Using the word "robbery" connected with the fight Jack/Stevenson tells the whole story. But "I don't blame you at all."

 

If i score a fight like the judges did then it isn't legitimate? lmao
I am far away from being percect in scoring fights, yes, i never said this, BUT my cards as legitimiate as yours and i considering defense as a factor. As it seems you have taken a look at my cards and my words about rounds so you must have read that i always writing about movement, defense, upper body movement, avoiding shots and so on.
YOU are not legitimate cause you are don't know what you are talking about.
You are not even a Top 10 scorer here.

 

Antoher big "LMAO" about your comment.

Ronny Mittag lost a fight on Friday with 2-10 rounds and raised the topic of corruption in the post fight interview at the ring because Sauerland hosted the event and his opponent was a Sauerland fighter.

Raising the topic directly after a result you don't like is on the card don't make it more true.