Jack gets jobbed, once again. What a joke boxing has become.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by MVC!, May 20, 2018.


  1. MVC!

    MVC! The Best Ever Full Member

    60,123
    5,606
    Nov 5, 2013
    But you don't, you don't even know what defense is and you never factored it in while scoring. So no, your cards aren't legitimate.

    I already said, two of the judges in this site gave Stevenson too much credit and too little for Jack. There was corruption going on.

    Jack clearly won that fight if you take into account who did the better work each and every one of those rounds. End of story.
     
  2. f1ght3rz

    f1ght3rz Ronaldoooo is crying in his caaaaaar Full Member

    17,693
    21,284
    Jan 31, 2018
    I know i have to learn a lot, everyone has including you.

    You are scoring fights since Julius Caesar was the man, or?
     
  3. MVC!

    MVC! The Best Ever Full Member

    60,123
    5,606
    Nov 5, 2013
    Of course I'm not perfect, but I'm clearly the top scorer here.

    It's obvious because I'm literally the only one who factors in all 4 categories of scoring.
     
  4. f1ght3rz

    f1ght3rz Ronaldoooo is crying in his caaaaaar Full Member

    17,693
    21,284
    Jan 31, 2018
    Mate, i am doing this sports since i am 9 years old and you want to tell me i don't know what defense is. You disqualifed yourself with that. lol
     
  5. MVC!

    MVC! The Best Ever Full Member

    60,123
    5,606
    Nov 5, 2013
    Well, from how you speak, I don't get the sense that you really understand defense in the context of scoring. Sorry. Can you really tell me that you factor in defense while scoring?

    Don't lie to yourself.
     
  6. f1ght3rz

    f1ght3rz Ronaldoooo is crying in his caaaaaar Full Member

    17,693
    21,284
    Jan 31, 2018
    No, man, you aren't. But you definitely the best in having crazy views.
     
  7. MVC!

    MVC! The Best Ever Full Member

    60,123
    5,606
    Nov 5, 2013
    Yes, crazy because I factor in all 4 categories while scoring.

    /s

    If you can't see it from my point of view, I just don't see why you think your cards are legitimate.

    It just isn't.

    No matter how much you try to weasel your way out of this, it isn't gonna work!

    Your card isn't legitimate, because you undermined or completely prioritized other categories.
     
  8. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    243,513
    237,572
    Nov 23, 2013
    No, none of the judges knew how to score, including you, none of them got it right, the only guy who got jabbed last night was the Pimp. Who won 115-113. Goddamn you MVC for making me defend that vomit.:mad:
     
  9. MVC!

    MVC! The Best Ever Full Member

    60,123
    5,606
    Nov 5, 2013
    You've always hated Jack :mad::2guns:
     
  10. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    243,513
    237,572
    Nov 23, 2013
    Not even close to how much I despise Stevenson.
     
  11. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,044
    11,082
    Jan 6, 2007

    He didn't !

    I was cheering for Jack, but he gave away the first 6 rounds.

    He won the second 6, but that makes for a draw.

    It is true that the first six were very close and the second six were much more decisive, but the fight gets scored by rounds.

    There was a round in the first six that could have gone to Jack, but round 10 could have gone to Stevenson.


    So, 7- 5 or 5 - 7 were within the realm of reasonable.

    But 6 - 6 was the fairest score.

    And this was how two judges saw it as well as the overwhelming majority of those scoring it on the RBR thread.

    As big George used to say, if you have concerns about the judges, don't leave it in their hands.

    Just Knock the M*****-F***** out !
     
  12. f1ght3rz

    f1ght3rz Ronaldoooo is crying in his caaaaaar Full Member

    17,693
    21,284
    Jan 31, 2018
    MCV! should replace Adalaide Byrd! Start a petition!
     
  13. MVC!

    MVC! The Best Ever Full Member

    60,123
    5,606
    Nov 5, 2013
    He did NOT give away the first six rounds, stop pedaling that absurd theory lol.

    He won the 1st round if anything. Let's say he really did give away the next 5, he still won 7 rounds.

    Um, Jack brought up corruption afterwards. I think that had a lot in play.

    There's no possible way that Adonis won this fight, Jack did more and won 7 rounds. 7 rounds was so easy to see lol.
     
  14. GK BOX

    GK BOX Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,833
    6,109
    Nov 23, 2015
    7-5 either way is fine
    6-6 is fine too
    Was a close fight
    The end
     
  15. f1ght3rz

    f1ght3rz Ronaldoooo is crying in his caaaaaar Full Member

    17,693
    21,284
    Jan 31, 2018
    The only thing that is complety absurd and crazy is that you scored the fight 115-113 so you scored it very CLOSE on yourself BUT persisting that it's the only way to score the fight so if you have it like 7-5 for Jack it's okay but 6-6 is completly wrong. LMAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAO
    This is the perfect evidence that you are have no clue what you are writing about.
    A perfect judge won't say 115-113 in a close fight is the only way to score it.
    He would explain WHY he scored it that way and would accept a 6-6 too.
     
    AlwaysFirst likes this.