lol rd10 was a Stevenson round imo, he hurt Jack badly there and it was close before so you can not even score it as a draw rd11 aswell a stevenson round THis is what i mean. There is no one perfect way to score a fight. Live with that MCV No way this was a clear 7-5 for Jack. NO WAY it was close af and the draw is an absolutely solid result
No it wasn't a Stevenson round, you don't win a round by losing the majority of it and then getting a good shot in. Sorry. Nor was 11 a Stevenson round. This is why you have tons to learn.
The problem with Badou Jack is that he starts late which gives his opponent a chance to build a lead. Stevenson won the first 5 rounds but Jack, argubally, won the last five. A draw was understandable.
Round 1 Jack 10-9 Round 2 Stevenson 10-9 Round 3 Stevenson 10-9 Round 4 Stevenson 10-9 Round 5 Stevenson 10-9 Round 6 Stevenson 10-9 Round 7 Jack 10-9 Round 8 Jack 10-9 Round 9 Jack 10-9 Round 10 Stevenson 10-9 Round 11 Stevenson 10-9 Round 12 Jack 10-9 115-113 Stevenson It could be argued that Jack deserved the 4th, but it could also be argued Stevenson took the 1st. 114-114 or 116-112 Stevenson, along with my 115-113 are the only possible scores. Jack did not do enough to win it.
If you hurt your opponent badly and you are close to take him out then this is definitely enough to win a round. Yes.
Not even close, first of all he wasn't ready to go and even if he was, that still does NOT justifiably negate the work o of the rest of the round. This is why I said, you have a lot to learn son. A lot.
The scorecard above is the perfect example. It is a legit scorecard with a fair result. BUT a draw is also a fair and legit scorecard. 115-113 for Jack also. There are at least three rounds (1,4,11) which you can score in either way or as a draw.
Jack vs Stevenson was the definition of a draw, if anybody did the more compelling work to earn the victory it was Stevenson 115-113, and I like Jack and hate Adonis. Jack just doesn't do enough/starts to late in some of his most important fights to get the nod, and that's hard for someone who isn't biased to argue with the exception of trolls like MVC.
No way. Stevenson clearly stole the round there hurting Jack badly. If you connect clean and avoid some shots from the opponent, yeah it's probably enough to win a round where nothing specical happens BUT if you get caught and hurt badly afterwards, nearly taken out, then you did not win the round with the work before. No ****in way. It was a Jack round before, but a round lasts 3 minutes so Stevenson definitely stole the round there in the end. You can not score the round for Jack when he gets nearly stopped. What's that?
Not only was he nowhere near getting stopped, he won the majority of that round. Like I said, you cannot negate the work preceding that punch. You get caught up in that just as the majority do, you also don't score defense. Sorry your card cannot be seen as legitimate.
Round 10 the round Stevenson hurt Jack bad to the body and had him reeling for the last minute could have very well went to Adonis as well. Though I still thought Jack did enough in the first 2 minutes to nick the round.
Yes, one punch CAN change everything, if it is the right punch on the right position of the body. Your comments on the fight are biased and subjective, i don't want to say my card is perfect, but it's more legit than your whole trash talk here. It was a Jack round, then Stevenson caught Jack and hurt him. For me he stole the round there with that. Live with that. Legit view.
