What a scrub... Handle this biz on your own.. What is kiwiman supposed to convince me GGG win that fight? Absolutely not, I think canelo won a close fight, oh well... Deal with it Fangirl
I had GGG 115-113 but a draw is certainly feasible. The fight was close and competitive, not a robbery despite Byrds horrible card. Canelo was meant to get destroyed in 6 so it did calm the hype down a bit.
Week in week out we watch boxers on PEDs anyway so wether he’s clean or juiced matters not,too much has been made of that imo.
Many people expected Golovkin to stop Canelo in the first fight, which didn't come close to happening, so why should we expect G to win 9-3, 10-2 in the rematch? I mean G fanboys even thought G won the first fight 9-3, 10-2 and Canelo schooled him in the art of counter punching and setting traps so I mean Canelo could school Golovkin again and you might still say it was a 9-3, 10-2 kind of a fight in favor of G, so what does that mean anyway? Ironically those are similar scores that Byrd was so harshly criticized for with the shoe on the other foot.
Just depends if you think Canelos got another level,personally I thought Canelo was brilliant in a close competitive fight but I ain’t sure he can do any better than that
what does that even mean lmao? The fact is both fighters were enrolled in VADA before during and after the first fight and Canelo didn't test positive. As you know, "VADA catches people". It's quite impossible for someone to be "juiced to the eyeballs" while being randomly VADA tested throughout the camp leading up to the fight, and on the day of the fight, etc. This comment shows how biased and delusional C.J. is and lets be real, it's really an indefensible comment by C.J. !