Stopped reading at - It was Canelo who had already kept the older Golovkin idle for a full year before agreeing to honour the rematch clause Fake news.
Daily Fail. Horrid publication. And what's a 'laughing stoke'? That said, some valid points from an online news outlet that normally goes for nipple slip pics...
I quite liked it and i usually hate anything from the Daily Mail. This guy is talking from a neutral point of view. He sees it how GGG fans see and he sees it how the neutrals see it. He doesnt see it how Canelo fans see it and ofcourse those trolls that just want to always side with bad guy, or unpopular view point for the sake of an argument. Unfortunatly Canelo, Oscar and GBP are much much more concerned about money than they are legacy, reputations, they dont care if they are the bad guy as long as people are still buying their tickets and PPV,s. They dont care that they have been cheating for years, they dont even care that they have been caught and dont think for 1 minute they are guna stop either, and the drugs is only 1 aspect of their cheating ways. They wont pay 50-50 to rake some respect back into their fighter cuz the money is more important so its never guna happen. I can see them accepting 60-40, maybe, but will Golovkin? If he doesnt then i respect his decision to walk away, i already know who the better fighter is, ive already seen him beat Canelo once.
Im not saying everything he is saying is correct, im just saying he is speaking from a neutral position, thats how he sees it and that is how alot of neutrals are seeing it. And its certainly not far off how i see it.