Tommy Hearns vs David Haye at light heavy who wins this fantasy fight?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mark ant, May 30, 2018.


  1. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,562
    May 4, 2017
    I feel Carl Thompson was exactly like Andries and that Hearns would of destroyed Thompson compared to how Haye gassed and got knocked out by this bum also Hill would out jabbed Haye even though he lost to a 30 year old Tommy what do you think?
     
  2. PernellSweetPea

    PernellSweetPea Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,116
    5,725
    Feb 26, 2009
    Hard to say. 175 pounds? Haye was more built for that division than Hearns was.
     
  3. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,562
    May 4, 2017
    Hearns knocked out a natural light heavy in the form of Andries and Haye was knocked out by Thompson who did not punch harder than Tommy plus Hearns had a reach as long as Muhammad Ali at 78".
     
  4. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,723
    29,073
    Jun 2, 2006
    Haye by ko.
     
  5. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,562
    May 4, 2017
    I feel Hearns would of stopped Thompson quicker and not missed with so many punches Haye has problems with a long jab.
     
  6. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,562
    May 4, 2017
    This content is protected
     
  7. PernellSweetPea

    PernellSweetPea Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,116
    5,725
    Feb 26, 2009
    Hearns started at such a lower weight. To me the fight is too big a difference in size. Many people think Hearns can go up to any weight because of height, but I don't think that is true. When he fought Ray or Benitez or Duran, he didn't look that huge, just thin and tall.
     
  8. Cecil

    Cecil Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,102
    5,225
    Mar 22, 2015
    I’m not mad on Haye, but I think he’d spark Hearns.
     
  9. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,562
    May 4, 2017
    It was his reach that bothered those guys, his reach was the same as Ali`s at 78" I think Andries could of beaten Haye had they been around at the same time because Andries was just like Thompson and punched hard enough to stop Haye.
     
  10. Webbiano

    Webbiano Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,587
    2,493
    Nov 6, 2011
    Judging Haye for what he did in his 11th pro fight doesn't make sense. Also judging how Haye would do at light heavyweight doesn't make much sense either, considering he never fought at that weight.
     
  11. PernellSweetPea

    PernellSweetPea Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,116
    5,725
    Feb 26, 2009
    Andries could have beaten Haye. Yes. Andries was underrated in many ways, but even though Hearns beat him, stylistically. Andries was a stronger guy than Hearns naturally. and some guys who Hearns struggled with Andries would not... I think Andries could have beaten Barkley at 175.
     
  12. Webbiano

    Webbiano Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,587
    2,493
    Nov 6, 2011
    Why are we comparing a career long cruiserweight and heavyweight campaigner in mythical match ups against light heavyweights? Haye would be so drained at light heavyweight that Nathan Cleverley or a 51 year old Hopkins would blow him out.
     
  13. BitPlayerVesti

    BitPlayerVesti Boxing Drunkie Full Member

    8,584
    11,099
    Oct 28, 2017
    Hearne destroys the half starved mess of Haye that makes 175