Does Harry Wills have a case to be ranked higher than Jack Dempsey?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by SuzieQ49, Jun 2, 2018.


  1. edward morbius

    edward morbius Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,986
    1,262
    Sep 5, 2011
    "both were expected to bring their best"

    Yeah.

    And why assume that the guy who won decisively didn't bring a better best?

    Normally in sports the winner is considered better than the loser, especially when he wins clearly as in this case.

    I think the onus, to use your term, is on you to explain why the loser of an elimination gets the fight with the champion. And it is not like Dempsey couldn't have fought them both. Whom exactly did he defend against in 1922? He was inactive, so he could have defended against Greb.
     
  2. edward morbius

    edward morbius Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,986
    1,262
    Sep 5, 2011
    "You've implied it throughout the entire thread."

    I never implied any such thing. This is just your presumption.

    "I don't know"

    Neither do I.

    "at least he was trying and actively showing interest"

    Once the demand for the Wills fight got too hot to ignore.

    "Better than sitting on his ass doing nothing."

    Isn't that a pretty accurate description of his title reign in 1924 and 1925.
     
  3. Mr.DagoWop

    Mr.DagoWop Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,129
    1,762
    Jul 1, 2015
    Because both guys looked like trash.
     
  4. Mr.DagoWop

    Mr.DagoWop Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,129
    1,762
    Jul 1, 2015
    You're all good my dude.
     
  5. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    I’m gay? Is that supposed to be an insult? This is the 21st century...grow up. This is pure homophobia. No need for this kind of talk on this forum

    Hope you enjoyed your stay here. Mods will clean you out real soon
     
    mrkoolkevin, Drew101, mcvey and 2 others like this.
  6. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    Even though one guy Greb, won most of the rounds.
     
  7. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    Here's a temporary opinion...

    3/7/22

    "Downright fear of Will is about the only thing which will avert the Dempsey-Wills encounter. Perhaps after what Harry Wills showed in the ring no amount of money can induce Kearns to permit Dempsey to meet the giant black man....

    The Wills that finished Norfolk in less than two rounds can take Tom Gibbons, Fred Fulton and Bill Brennan, or any other three heavyweights that can be named, including Carpentier, in the same ring on the same night and stop the whole trio inside of 10 rounds.

    It is even to be doubted whether Jack Kearns, despite everything has been agreed upon regarding a match with Wills, will now consent to permit Dempsey to go through with it. The Dempsey-Kearns scouts that were at the ringside have informed Kearns exactyl what happened...

    The Wills who beat Norfolk is bigger, stronger, faster and a harder hitter than Dempsey."
     
    Seamus likes this.
  8. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,555
    46,135
    Feb 11, 2005
    Jack Dempsey himself said it was the best fight he had ever seen.
     
    SuzieQ49 likes this.
  9. Mr.DagoWop

    Mr.DagoWop Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,129
    1,762
    Jul 1, 2015
    He must have seen some pretty boring fights then. Got any proof that he said that or as usual are you making **** up?
     
  10. Mr.DagoWop

    Mr.DagoWop Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,129
    1,762
    Jul 1, 2015
    He didn't win 7 of the rounds out of 15.
     
  11. The Morlocks

    The Morlocks Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,717
    8,939
    Nov 21, 2009
    I agree brother its like spinning on a dime going nowhere.. the same threads and arguements ad nauseam. Maybe it's time to take time off to study other interests.
     
    mcvey likes this.
  12. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    This might even be funnier than your other post
     
  13. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,726
    29,076
    Jun 2, 2006
    Source?

    http://www.boxing.com/the_trouble_with_harry.html
     
    Last edited: Jun 5, 2018
  14. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,726
    29,076
    Jun 2, 2006
    Source?

    Wills defends his world 'colored' heavyweight title claim

    "When they came out of their corners in the second, Norfolk went into a clinch and a moment later fell backward to the floor, taking the full count. No one at the ringside saw the blow that felled him.

    After the count, he walked to his corner and did not seem hurt. Wills said the blow was a short inside right to the jaw. Referee Kid McPartland told newspaper men that he saw the blow delivered and that it did not travel more than six inches. The crowd expressed its disapproval of the manner in which the match was terminated. It did not appear to them that Norfolk had been hit.

    However, to prove that he really went down under a powerful punch, Norfolk displayed a deep cut in his mouth caused by the blow. In the first round, Norfolk took the aggressive and swung a left to Wills' head, Wills returned a straight right to the chin and followed Norfolk into a corner, landing a left to the jaw.

    They sparred for an opening. Wills landed a light left to the body, and Norfolk fell heavily to the floor when he missed a long right swing to the body. Wills landed a left jab at the bell. In the second, they met in a clinch, and after a short interchange, Norfolk fell away from Wills, landing heavily on his shoulders after twenty-six seconds of fighting. Wills said he had floored Norfolk with a short left to the body and an inside short right to the jaw."

    Nevada State Journal
    Sounds like a real barn burner doesn't it? lol
     
    The Morlocks likes this.
  15. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,726
    29,076
    Jun 2, 2006
    Firpo did not train seriously for Wills the film of the fight shows him carrying excess flab on his body he weighed 224.5lbs for Wills, whereas for Dempsey he was 216.5lbs. Look at the two fights and tell me I'm wrong. The papers castigated Wills after the fight and said he would have no chance with Dempsey.
    "In 1924, Wills was offered a golden opportunity. He accepted an offer to fight the feared Luis Firpo, who had nearly dethroned Dempsey a year before. Promoted by Tex Rickard, Wills and Firpo met at Boyles Thirty Acres, New Jersey, on September 11, 1924. Jack Dempsey was at ringside. This intriguing matchup has largely been lost to history.

    Both Wills and Firpo were knockout artists of roughly the same size. Firpo was slightly heavier and an inch taller than Wills. The Times Daily reported the odds at all but even on the day of the fight. The fight went the full 15 rounds to end in a no-decision contest. The newspapers including the Quebec Daily Telegraph hailed Wills as a winner who “took almost every round and in the second round floored his opponent.” In front of an audience 75,000, it was the highest profile fight of Wills’ career. But while the fight put Wills in the spotlight, it also put him under the microscope. After three years campaigning as top contender, some witnesses were not impressed. The Milwaukee Journal headlined, “Harry Wills No Match for Champion Dempsey. Wills general ability as a fighter would not be sufficiently high to stand the champion off. Firpo not only telegraphs his wallops, but sends a letter of warning…but Dempsey doesn’t telegraph. His punches come from a short distance and behind them lurk oblivion."
     
    The Morlocks likes this.