Harry Wills vs Jess Willard primes

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by SuzieQ49, Jun 7, 2018.


  1. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    I just watched some more film of Willard. He jabbed then stood there. No follow up combinations. His footwork was non existent. He wasn’t very active. He was stationary with no head movements as evident the way a 37 year old jack johnson hit him with a 6 punch combination. Willard was under developed when it came to using his length. He’d throw a jab or one twice then allowed his man inside without much of an effort. He didn’t throw a left hook Ever.


    Wills has the advantage here. Wills was slick, very clever. Had pin point accuracy in his straight punches and he threw damaging blows on the inside. A big target like Willard would be ripe for Wills to mix it up To the head and body . Wills was very athletic and strong, he would surprisingly win the battle in close because wills understood leverage and
    Willard didn’t


    Competition heavily favors wills. Wills beat a Willard clone in Fulton easily. Wills also beat the same Langford who knocked out two men whom outpointed Willard

    Willard never took boxing seriously, didn’t train, and didn’t have enough fights. He wasn’t seasoned like wills was


    Wills dominates him
     
    edward morbius likes this.
  2. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    Considering he got inside on an arguably more skilled and better jabber in Fulton and broke 2 of his ribs, I like wills chances getting inside here.
     
  3. Webbiano

    Webbiano Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,608
    2,497
    Nov 6, 2011
    You're 100% right Suzie Wills win KO round 1 Willard has no chance well done for sucking the life out of your own thread
     
  4. The Morlocks

    The Morlocks Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,717
    8,944
    Nov 21, 2009
    I may be immature, but thats funny as ****! KUDOS Web! Btw suzie, cooney WAS a bum.
     
    Last edited: Jun 8, 2018
  5. BitPlayerVesti

    BitPlayerVesti Boxing Drunkie Full Member

    8,584
    11,099
    Oct 28, 2017
    Is Wills that great? He looks pretty poor in the footage of him, I don't think that's the best way to judge a fighter, but I think people are being unusually quick to dismiss the footage compared to when discussing other boxers

    This content is protected


    A rather soft looking Firpo didn't seem to have too much trouble landing on him, and Wills looked rather slow and reliant on hitting and holding, which I'm not sure would be the best tactic against Willard.
     
    The Morlocks likes this.
  6. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    Yes Wills was great. He was the number 1 contender from 1916-1925 according to Matty Ds rankings....9 years as number one contender without a title shot from Willard or Dempsey.

    1. Wills was 35 when the Firpo fight took place in 1924. Unless film of wills in 1918 emerges, you shouldn’t be so quick to judge a fighter in decline. Imagine if we only judged Joe Louis based on his fights in the 1950s ?

    2. Wills won every round against Firpo except 1 which was even. Despite being much younger and bigger, Firpo was tossed around the ring like a rag doll by an old man. Wills was never close to losing and lifted Firpo off his feet with a right hand
     
    Last edited: Jun 8, 2018
  7. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    Looks like you threw in the towel because you don’t have any stylistic analysis or useful information!

    Classic Webbiano!
     
  8. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    Yeah I can tell you’ve never played a sport in your life. Must be great to have mommy and daddy do everything for you huh? Enjoy your day of lying on the couch smokin a bowl while you wave goodbye to Mom and dad as they leave to support you
     
  9. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007
    If they fought three times, I think each would win once. Wills did not have the best of chin, and wasn't fast either, which would allow a slower and stronger Willard to land with less difficulty.
     
  10. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,126
    Jun 2, 2006
    He didn't lose to him! Good enough excuse?

    1914 Mar 27 Tom "Bearcat" McMahon Youngstown, Oh ND 12 -Some sources report "L 12
     
  11. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,126
    Jun 2, 2006
    Are Matty D's ratings gospel then? Or is it just that they agree with your agenda? I asked before where his area of expertise lay and so far have received no answer.
     
    Last edited: Jun 8, 2018
  12. edward morbius

    edward morbius Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,986
    1,262
    Sep 5, 2011
    "Firpo didn't seem to have too much trouble landing on him"

    That is not what I saw. Firpo hit Wills with rabbit punches in the clinches. Other than that he simply missed every punch. Wills easily ducked those overhand rights. Firpo telegraphed his punches, but he managed to hit Dempsey with the same lead right hands.

    My take is against Firpo and especially Madden, Wills looks like a rather impressively athletic guy. He is big and rather fast, and well-coordinated. I don't like the way he carries his hands low, but most did back then. But he by no means looks that easy to hit.

    For me, it is easy to see why Wills won every, or practically every, round against Firpo.
     
    SuzieQ49 likes this.
  13. edward morbius

    edward morbius Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,986
    1,262
    Sep 5, 2011
    I think Wills shows impressive athleticism for a 35 year old man on the films of the Firpo and Madden fights.

    He moves very well and shows good head movement. Not that easy a man to hit.

    I like Wills to beat any version of Willard.

    *by the way, Wills doesn't look all that slow to me for a big man. He impresses me as moving very well. I noticed he used a jab against Madden. I think a match with Tunney would have been very interesting. My bottom line is even this 35 year old version of Wills looks leagues better than any Dempsey opponent prior to Tunney and Sharkey we have on film.
     
    SuzieQ49 likes this.
  14. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,462
    2,814
    Aug 26, 2011
    Wills is not beating the Willard that showed up to Havana. That Willard was willing to go through hell to get the job done. While Johnson was past his best, he likely still carried his power pretty well. He hit Willard with everything but the kitchen sink and Willard wasn't the least bit fazed. I've never seen Wills attack with the furry Johnson did that day, so I'm just not seeing how Wills is going to win that type of fight. Most other versions, sure, I would favor Wills.
     
  15. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005