Who rates higher all time Jeffries or Dempsey?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by SuzieQ49, Jun 10, 2018.


  1. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,428
    45,915
    Feb 11, 2005
    But he would hit against a cripple. He wasn't totally prejudiced.
     
    SuzieQ49 likes this.
  2. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,731
    Sep 14, 2005

    I think Fitzsimmons of the first Jeffries fight was better than any version of Jack Sharkey. Sharkey was very inconsistent, not much of a puncher, and couldn't take the best punch. Fitzsimmons obliterated hall of fame fighters in 1901 who was near equals to Jack Sharkey.
     
  3. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,560
    27,187
    Feb 15, 2006
    I probably would give Dempsey credit for having the best single win of the two.

    Fitzsimmons was overconfident the first time he met Jeffries, and the second fight was alowed to roll over a bit too long.

    Dempsey arguably beat Sharkey at the very top of his game, and of course when he had seen better days himself.

    Having said that, I am standing by my pick.
     
  4. Mr.DagoWop

    Mr.DagoWop Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,129
    1,762
    Jul 1, 2015
    Come up with that one on your own?

    False. It was not the landslide you seem to be implying.

    Unofficial UP scorecard - 9-3-3 Greb
    Unofficial INS scorecard - 8-5-2 Greb

    At best Greb didn't win 6 rounds, 7 at worst.

    It would have been awesome to see a Greb-Dempsey fight but don't act like it was some artistic duck. Greb lost to Tunney prior to the Gibbons bout taking place. By your logic shouldn't Tunney have gotten the shot since the guy who won the title eliminator lost?

    If you ask me Dempsey should have fought both Greb and Gibbons. Both were great fighters who were on crazy high win streaks. I just think overall Gibbons proved he was better than Greb because he beat Greb much more decisively than Greb beat him. One was in an electrical storm so in reality that shouldn't even count. The other was against a bad version of Gibbons plain and simple.
     
  5. Mr.DagoWop

    Mr.DagoWop Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,129
    1,762
    Jul 1, 2015
    He was just fine in his most recent fights. He overworked himself in the gym. Just had an off night, unfortunately that was against atg Harry Greb.

    No. Greb had more fights up to that point.

    Gibbons was on a 26 fight win streak with 21 knockouts. I don't think so. He also continued his win streak with only one loss to Miske, a disqualification.

    They weren't.
     
  6. Mr.DagoWop

    Mr.DagoWop Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,129
    1,762
    Jul 1, 2015
    No quality of footage is going to change the fact that they didn't throw a lot of punches each round. I'm not doggin' on them for it, it's just the strategy they used and in a 45 round fight that would be appropriate. Over 15 that's inefficient.

    Slapping Dempsey once every 30 seconds isn't going to win him anything. Gibbons was more effective. Same with Fitz, he could punch but he fought in the context of 45 rounds and he had an unreliable chin. Dempsey would clobber him in the opening round. Neither guy you mentioned could do better against Dempsey than Sharkey did.

    You're wrong. Heeney didn't fight anything like they did in the 1890s. For one he throws more than one punch at a time and has a style clearly more suited for the era he fought in. It's not comparable. What you were trying to do is take a rated fighter from the era and liken him to those from the 1890s so as to prove that Fitz and Corbett's respective styles would be competitive in Dempsey's era when they wouldn't.

    Foreman beat Frazier who beat Ali. But guess what?
     
    louis54 likes this.
  7. edward morbius

    edward morbius Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,986
    1,262
    Sep 5, 2011
    Greb lost to Tunney prior to the Gibbons bout taking place."

    No he didn't. Greb beat Gibbons on 3/13/1922. Greb defeated Tunney on 5/23/1922. At this point it was time for the big summer fights, such as a heavyweight championship fight. There was none that year though. Dempsey did not defend at all. Greb first lost to Tunney in a re-match on 2/23/1923.

    The decisive win over Greb by Gibbons was seven years earlier. Impossible for me to see why this should trump a 1922 elimination fight.

    "At best Greb didn't win 6 rounds. 7 at worst."

    Well at best Gibbons didn't win 10 rounds. 12 at worst.

    I really don't see the point being made. Greb won decisively.
     
    SuzieQ49 likes this.
  8. Mr.DagoWop

    Mr.DagoWop Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,129
    1,762
    Jul 1, 2015
    Prior to the Gibbons-Dempsey fight.

    That was the first match. Gibbons gave Greb "the licking of his life" on May 15, 1920. They fought 4 total times, not three.

    Decisive is winning nearly all or all of the rounds. Gibbons managed to solidly win 3-5 of the rounds. 2 or 3 of the rounds were even which means neither showed distinct dominance in those rounds. What's the problem in admiting the fight wasn't a landslide for Greb? It was a clear win but not a landslide. That's what the people that were there said about it. Who the hell are you to say differently?

    Am I arguing with you or Suzie? If you want to argue with posts of mine that are in reply to him then you must assume the same positions as him.
     
  9. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,731
    Sep 14, 2005
    Boxing Historian Steve Compton on Greb Gibbons fights


    The first Greb-Gibbons fight was held in Tommy's home town and was the first fight Greb ever had outside of the Penn/Ohio area and he was fighting the student and chief sparring partner of the best P4P fighter in the world. Gibbons was undefeated despite having already faced several contenders and in fact would continue undefeated for another 5 years suffering his first defeat at Greb's hands. They had two common opponents to that point: Joe Borrell who Greb had lost and drawn with but who Gibbons had defeated and Billy Miske who Greb had drawn with but Gibbons had defeated twice. Greb went into that fight as the underdog and despite this the Twin Cities press lauded his performance and wrote letters back to Pittsburgh telling the press there that he had made a hit and was welcome back any time and not to hold the loss against him. In fact based on that performance he was signed to fight Mike O'Dowd the following month in St. Paul but had to cancel after he broke his arm against Kid Graves. Kid Graves subbed for Greb and defeated O'Dowd as well. I doubt it helped Greb's performance that hanging over his head was the fact that less than a week after his bout with Gibbons he was expected to testify in court against a man who shot one of Greb's friends in the face and who blamed Greb for the altercation. The weights were 158 pounds at 3pm on the afternoon of the fight.


    For their second fight in Pittsburgh Greb had suffered a broken hand against Bob Roper in Denver that had curtailed his planned western tour. The hand had not healed 100% by the time he was signed to fight Gibbons and it prevented him from training much more than roadwork. Yet, despite his previous loss to Gibbons Greb was confident of winning and by this point in his career was good enough that he had beaten several fighters while he suffered one or both hands broken. He dearly wanted revenge against Gibbons for the previous loss which he considered one of only five legitimate losses on his record at that point (he had avenged all of the others). Now here is the interesting thing: The contract for this fight called for the weigh in to be at 3pm on the day of the fight with both fighters to weigh 165 pounds. If you look at Greb's record this fight was held on May 15 but it was originally scheduled for May 12. On may 12 at 3pm both fighters weighed in at 165 but later that day, before the fight, rain moved in forcing a postponement of three days. Greb could make 165 easily but Gibbons couldnt. He was already growing into a full fledged LHW. Red Mason argued that Gibbons must weigh again because the contract demanded that the weights be held to the day of the fight. Gibbons refused and Mason demanded Gibbons' weight forfeit. Again Gibbons refused and threatened to walk away from the fight if he had to weigh in or pay. Finally Gibbons was allowed to not weigh. Ringside the weights were announced as Greb weighing 165 and Gibbons weighing 166 but there was no official weigh in so this was merely Gibbons' word. For all anyone knows he weighed 175 pounds. Now, Greb got a beating and a good one. But the next day he was out begging for an immediate rematch. This wasnt lip service either because the first opportunity Gibbons gave him he jumped at it. Now thats the mark of a guy who knows he can improve upon his performance and he did.


    When the fighters agreed to face each other in the rematch Gibbons' handling of the weight in the previous fight was a major sticking point. As such he had to agree to make 163 at 10am on the morning for this fight. The problem was that there was no formal contract for this fight, just a verbal agreement. As such when fight time came around Greb weighed 160.5 pounds and once again Gibbons refused to weigh in. Red Mason almost pulled Greb out of the fight but this would have left the promoters holding a heavy loss so the sheriff stepped in and helped to negotiate a compromise. Gibbons would be allowed to fight without weighing in and Greb would be given half of his weight forfeit, which amounted to $250. For this fight Greb had left no stone underturned in training and even traveled to New York to train with Jack Dempsey, giving the champion all he wanted. Greb went in and beat Gibbons fair and square rain or no rain. Before the rain had even started Greb had drawn first blood and hurt Gibbons several times. Every single round Greb picked up the pace and by the 10th Greb was fighting faster than he had in the first round and Gibbons looked confused and utterly bewildered as Greb blasted him around the ring to the crowds amazement. Fluke my ass. Rain my ass.


    The fourth fight is interesting because Gibbons always swore up and down that he would knock Greb out in a long fight and this bout was scheduled for 15 rounds. He was now on a 26 fight win streak (his last loss being to Greb). 21 of those wins were by knockout. He was considered the front runner for a shot at Dempsey and the bout was billed by Tex Rickard as an eliminator to decide Dempsey's logical opponent. Gibbons opened an 8 to 5 favorite in the bout and the odds grew in his favor to 2 to 1 as the fight drew near (some reports had him a 3-1 favorite). He was expected to knock Greb out. To date it was the most important fight either fighter had ever been involved in. It was a cross promotion held in conjunction with the Milk Fund (Milk Fund bouts were enormous for a decade to come). Its gate receipts were in the top ten of all time to that point and in the top five (if I recall correctly) for indoor boxing events. The crowd was populated with society from the Roosevelts, to the Astors, to the Vanderbilts. The bout was filmed (now lost) and based on the victory Greb was thrown a massive parade on his return to Pittsburgh, got a vaudville lucrative contract, was asked to write a series of articles to be syndicated for newspapers nationwide, and won the right to challenge for the HW championship by Dempsey's (who called it the best fight he ever saw) own admission. The fight itself was a masterful performance with Greb alternately boxing rings around Gibbons and outslugging him when Gibbons was able to corner him despite Gibbons having every physical advantage. So with everything on the line, with all of the chips down, and with every advantage Gibbons lost. The weights for this bout were 171 for Gibbons and 163.5 for Greb.
     
  10. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,731
    Sep 14, 2005

    I have never before in this forums history seen someone argue a guy who lost a world title eliminator deserved the title shot as much as the guy who beat him in the eliminater!
     
  11. Mr.DagoWop

    Mr.DagoWop Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,129
    1,762
    Jul 1, 2015
    Me: Uses primary source by people who saw the fight
    You: "Wah wah but Thteve Compton wrote this!"

    No mother****er. I don't care which historian or who you pull out of your ass as a source. The contemporary newspaper people who saw the fight live as it happened in the flesh on March 13, 1923 trumps a guy who was born probably 40 years after Greb died. Especially since his accounts of the fights give every excuse in the book for Greb and build up his wins over Gibbons as if they are colossal and his losses to Gibbons as minor setbacks that contrary to what everyone says, Greb did really good. Apparent fanboyism, yawn.
     
  12. Mr.DagoWop

    Mr.DagoWop Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,129
    1,762
    Jul 1, 2015
    I have never before seen such blatant bias get in the way of a poster being honest about Greb. That's not a good quality for you to have.
     
  13. Mr.DagoWop

    Mr.DagoWop Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,129
    1,762
    Jul 1, 2015
    Then Fitz must have a chin of pure china.
     
  14. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,731
    Sep 14, 2005
    Again,

    You posted two unnofficial AP scorecards which had Greb clearly winning the title eliminator...then you try to argue Gibbons deserved the title shot just as much as Greb.

    Why even have the title eliminater then?
     
  15. Mr.DagoWop

    Mr.DagoWop Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,129
    1,762
    Jul 1, 2015
    This is literally what I've been saying the entire time.

    Because they didn't expect both guys to look like dog ****.