He's talked banning regarding two people, lets not get overly dramatic and exaggerate ridiculously. Yes it's not a great look and one should probably just sit back and let nature take it's course (which it certainly did) but anyway.
Not once did I make this about a police thing. In fact, other posters like klompton even defended me on that. you're the only one so far who has "called me out" on it. Again, I never made this about a police thing. I called for his ban because he made racist and homophobic comments and tried to make another poster kill himself. Seems like you've had issues with me for a while now, youve called me out quite a few times, and you don't respond to my PMs. I Do not like that you claim I provoked him into him telling me to either get murdered on the job or kill my self. There is no such thing that should provoke someone to make sick comments like that. I hope we can forget about it and move forward. I am fine with whatever opinion you may have about police/military. Same with Dago wop even if I strongly disagree with his stance. But when he brings racism, homophobia, and suicidal threats into it...that's when it crosses the Line.
You could create the premise easily enough. Say Foreman holds all the belts, and Dempsey is the challenger, or there is a robust system in place to strip Dempsey if he does not fight Foreman.
I disagree with the suggestion that SuzieQ was somehow responsible for Mr. DagoWop's outburst. I didn't see him slinging mud or making any nasty comments--in fact, I saw the opposite. Am I missing something? He ignored numerous personal attacks and insults from MDW and addressed the substance of his posts on the merits without stooping to MDW's level. Having his insults ignored seemed to frustrate MDW even more, and he ratcheted up the vitriol and profanity until SQ gave his ad hominem attacks the attention he sought. He warned/threatened to report MDW. Not my style but so what? Why should anyone have to endure insults or reply in kind in order to discuss and debate boxing?
Eh, if one guy has been gratuitously abusive-especially if banned many times before-there is nothing wrong with pointing out the possible consequences & expressing indignation non-abusively. I have no problemo with that. The only unnecessary thing was a childish insult about helping Mom with the laundry. But the by far biggest offense was given by Mr. Dago Wop, based upon no visible provocation.
john do not intervene in the repeated requests for banning from this sad guy (suzie )without social life. you could say even good morning that this sad specimen will report the comment
Yes well said! I think the words to this song might induce some more tolerance from Suzie? This content is protected