How valuable is Golovkin’s chin??

Ali

 

if ggg didnt have a good chin he wouldnt be the ggg we know they wouldve tailored his style around his strengths and weaknesses so when people say if ggg didnt have a granite chin this or that wouldve happened it dont really make much sense

 

It's a good job that YDKSAB

 

How did Hopkins do against that Colombian journeyman Mercado?

 

Stevens, Canelo, Jacobs and Lemieux... Stevens and Lemieux p4p one of the hardest punchers

 

He could possibly be packing glass that the viewer doesn't know about!

 

Oh look. It’s my astute follower again Odin’s nut hair. Quoting my one post twice. Just admit you can’t help yourself. I’m a troll and a noob or whatever but it works you up. Bhop will forever be ranked over Golovkin at middleweight and ATG list. I don’t do these little side quest/reach around arguments. Let me know when a reputable source ranks Golovkin higher.

It will never happen. I don’t even know if Golovkin is better than Sergio Martinez and you’re trying to jump to Bhop.

Bhop started boxing at 19 in jail bro and went on to do things Golovkin will never accomplish. Your guys career just got hard. They’re not comparable.

 

Don't forget Rubio. He was a powerful puncher as well.

 

Jacobs nullified his power fighting in SP. He rarely landed knuckle during the fight. Stevens is a small guy and hasn’t done anything. Lemiex is self explanatory. Never solved Rubio and is getting toyed by BJS. Canelo couldn’t KO a drained Chavez Jr on roids (I’m only using your guys logic here).

Canelo has the best case of making HOF out of the guys you just mentioned and he started at 147. Jacobs has yet to do anything other than beat sergio Mora and Peter Quilen. That’s HOF worthy. You guys get lost in your own fanboy bs.

All Golovkin has done really is just fight in close fights with Canelo and Jacobs. Other than that he hasn’t done ****. He hasn’t moved up. He hasn’t gone undisputed in a weak division that just now has started cooking up. His career just got hard and he’s already given up on legacy and greatness not that they were ever his goals to begin with having such a poor resume and a slew of questionable decisions.

The game of charades is almost done here people. I’m merely just playing along for entertainment purposes but Golovkin is pretty much done.

 

If he had a **** chin he could have caught a loss against Canelo, he did slip through some really hard shots. That's about it.

 

I think GGG has a great chin, the shots he took from Jacobs and Canelo were WICKED.

 

How could he go undisputed when Billy Joe Saunders ducked him, jackass?

 

Please elaborate on this half truth and list all details and facts. Save me the time. I think they’re both even Stevens at this point you little garbage fanboy. You’re a 30 year old man child who watches WWE raw with your shiny polished fake belt in your mommas house.

Go waste someone’s else time bro.

 

no

 

Elaborate what? Even Saunders admitted that he waited for Golovkin to get old. His words, not mine. Saunders ducked him, period.

As for Crawford being undisputed, all he had to do is beating a mediocre Postol and a glass jawed Namibian bum, who got destroyed in 2 rounds by Prograis. Wow, what an achievement. Crawford's resume is still **** just like your posts.