Rating of the Heavyweights of New Millenium decade

No I unlike your **** sucking preference I prefer females, what were your scores for those fights, let me guess, you didn't see them

 

you score Skelton-Chagaev for Skelton yet you show this arrogance?

Ignorance is bliss i guess... even on the general forum, where Eastern Europeans aren't exactly liked, no one thought Matt deserved to win.


And you keep talking about Toney beating Ruiz..... it was a NC. Toney can't go more than 1 fight these days, without getting a steroid suspension. Sorry but it doesn't count.

 

I admitted to be drunk and I wasnt paying attention to this fight. Chagaev was ****ing **** got outpunched, pushed on the ropes for the duration of the fight and this should be his prime. Chagaev probably landed the better punches but he was ****, theres a good case Skeleton won, but I was drunk and I'm not watching 1 of the shittiest fights between 2 bums again. They're both bums end of discussion

I'm not counting steroids otherwise all of the heavyweight division would be excluded from our ratings

 

You too huh?

 

Well, you obviously didn't see those fights , and even admitted to being shitfaced for one of them. My guess is that you mistook the term boxrec, for boxrectum, given that you take misinformation up the ass...........

 

Nothing power puncher says can be taken seriously. Every fight involving a fighter that he doesn't favor, automatically is ruled as a robbery, when it doesn't go his way....

He is a Pea brain dickless shithead to say the least.........

 

I know you're a self-admitted juicer yourself and probably go by the "everyone uses it anyway" excuse, in fact, that's probably how you justified starting it. Now, i don't really give a damn how you look at the world, but that doesn't make your premise true. Fact is that Toney got caught on them contrary to the other guys we're discussing and the fight was ruled a NC with Toney being stripped of the title.

 

Rahman at #2 is lame. Rahman was a chump, plain and simple. Glass jawed and limited.

Wlad Klitschko is far superior, regardless of your dislike for his brother.

 

Rhaman at #2?

Holyfield at #5? Geez, Holyfield lost to Donald, *Toney, Ibragimov, and Ruiz this decade. He has beaten no one good.His prime was in the ealry to mid 90's, not the 2000's

Ruiz at #6? He got beat by two blown up middles, and Chagaev. By the way, Chagaev should rater as he beat your #6, and #9 guys and is undefeated.

Toney at #10? Where's Peter who is only lost once, but beat Toney twice?


My list would be

1. Lewis- Though he wasn't active for long, in the 00's and probaly belongs in the 90's.

2. Wlad.

3. Vitali.

4. Byrd.

The above fighters were all #1 in this decade at one time or another.
After the above 4, it gets a little murky.

-----------------------------------------

5. Chagaev

6. Rhaman

7. Tua

8. Peter

9. Brewster

10. Valuev

 

I just wanted to add, Holyfield was robbed against Valuev and Toney beat him

 

Fromm 2000 onwards.

Lewis
Wlad
Vitali
Byrd

those 4 should pick themselves really imo.

Toney
Ruiz
Rahman
Golota
Holyfield
Brewster

the last 6 or so are hard to separate imo.

Lewis is mainly at the top because of his exploits in the 90's and his victories over Tyson and Vitali. the 00-09 era is split between Lewis and Wlad and I have no qualms with someone putting Wlad top due to his 10-11 success.

 

Wlad
Lewis/Vitali
Byrd
Chagaev
Peter
Valuev
Brewster
Maskaev
Rahman

 

How would you guys rank Golota in this topic, if he got the decisions for the WBA & IBF titles against Ruiz & Byrd in 2004?

I thought Andrew won both of those fights.

 

I just want to point out, that this thread was constructed by SuzieQ around mid 2008. Therefore, the ratings for that decade should really only span from 2000-2009. Anything that occurred after 09' has to be discluded. Since the forming of the thread, Vitali Klitschko has returned, recapturing the WBC title from Sam Peter in the fall of 2008, then fighting Gomez, Arreola, and Johnson in 09'.