Joe Louis Gets A Pass For J H Lewis. Jack Dempsey Gets Ripped For Miske

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mcvey, Jul 6, 2018.


  1. BitPlayerVesti

    BitPlayerVesti Boxing Drunkie Full Member

    8,584
    11,099
    Oct 28, 2017
    The version I'd heard was it was for one last Christmas. Someone really should make a movie about it. It's not like holywood has a problem with spreading misconceptions even if it is a myth.
     
  2. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,724
    29,076
    Jun 2, 2006
    Yeah he got off his death bed had a further 24 fights ,none of which he lost over the next 3 years.
    And some here will tell you ranked contenders laid down to him because they felt sorry for him!
     
    richdanahuff likes this.
  3. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,982
    48,059
    Mar 21, 2007
    Yeah, it's because Louis fought defence after defence after defence, relentless, crushing it, the fightingist heavyweight champion of all time, Dempsey put the title to sleep and failed to fight the best.
     
    Unforgiven, Reason123 and Seamus like this.
  4. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,724
    29,076
    Jun 2, 2006
    Where was Fulton banned and disgraced he fought a month after the Miske fight[10 days] and had a further 3 fights that year?
     
  5. FrankinDallas

    FrankinDallas FRANKINAUSTIN

    29,981
    36,772
    Jul 24, 2004
    "Tepid " victories over Greb, Wills, Firpo, Gibbons, Norfolk. !?!. Yes I know Greb had ONLY 1 working eye at the time, but FFS all these names taken together on his record outshine GGG, Mayweather, Ward and others.

    It is illogical to say "Dempsey ducked Wills" and also "Wills was a tepid victory on Miskes record". Complete contradiction.
     
  6. FrankinDallas

    FrankinDallas FRANKINAUSTIN

    29,981
    36,772
    Jul 24, 2004
    This. I don't begrudge Dempsey picking and choosing his opponents, but he should have fought more times. Making $1000000/year outside the ring is no excuse.
     
    louis54 likes this.
  7. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    Winner.
     
  8. richdanahuff

    richdanahuff Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,489
    13,036
    Oct 12, 2013
    That's reasonable and can be seen as inexcusable
     
  9. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    I’ll say what others have said. Louis fought defense after defense and against several number 1 contenders while Dempsey never fought his number 1 or number 2 contender and put the title on ice for several years.

    So essentially, Louis squeezing in a defense against Lewis is forgiveable when he already cleaned out his top contenders, while Dempsey defended against Miske while Wills was still waiting in line
     
  10. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    You should breudge Dempsey for choosing Miske, Brennan, Gibbons, Carpenter and Fipro over Wills and Greb. Inexcusable.
     
  11. FrankinDallas

    FrankinDallas FRANKINAUSTIN

    29,981
    36,772
    Jul 24, 2004
    Illogical response. Miske beat 4 of the 6 men you mentioned. He was totally a totally reasonable opponent AT THE TIME. Not saying Dempsey should not have fought Wills and Greb, but Miske should and did deserve a bout before those guys.
     
    louis54 likes this.
  12. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    16,229
    11,698
    Sep 21, 2017
    A million dollars a year almost 100 years ago would be a mega fortune in today's dollars. Absurdly rich. A million dollars a year today would be considered wealthy
     
  13. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    16,229
    11,698
    Sep 21, 2017
    Soft defenses like this one:

    This content is protected
     
  14. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    I think your being illogical here by claiming Miske was a reasonable defense despite wills and Greb still waiting their turn. He wasn’t reasonable at all over Wills or Greb which we agree on.

    None of those men I listed were even close to Wills or Greb with the exception of Gibbons, and Gibbons got his rear kicked in an eliminator by Greb.

    A dying Miske was a pathetic opponent for a title defense when Greb and Wills still haven’t received their shots yet.
     
    Last edited: Jul 6, 2018
  15. klompton2

    klompton2 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    10,974
    5,432
    Feb 10, 2013
    What four of the six did he beat to get a title shot and when. Dont give me some bull**** argument that because he beat Brennan several years later that it justifies his title shot before. Dont give me some bull**** answer that because he got a very controversial DQ win over Gibbons several years later after losing every round of the fight that it justifies his title shot several years earlier. If anyone today got a title shot based off one win over a total bum in their last five fights and after having laid off a year due to severe health issues people would be absolutely livid. Why does Dempsey get a pass? Especially when you consider that the title had been placed on the line exactly 3 times in the previous FIVE years. Its ridiculous. When Billy Miske beat Bill Brennan Brennan was coming fresh off two consecutive losses to Greb in the previous two months. Then Miske draws with Brennan then Greb beats Brennan twice again. Greb had beaten Miske prior to that, and had beaten Gibbons, who Miske could do no better than earn a draw against, and had never lost to Levinsky which Miske did in convincing fashion in the run up to Dempsey. So tell me exactly how Miske was an acceptable challenge?? Likewise with Brennan? Brennan loses four fights to Greb, loses and draws a fight with a guy Greb beat, and then gets a title shot by beating and drawing with guys like Roper, Madden, Petroskey, Walker, Allen, Meehan, and Ashe, all guys Greb had already beaten. So Greb had beaten the best guys Brennan ran up his record against to fight Dempsey and had beaten the guys Brennan was drawing with and losing to and had beaten Brennan four times himself. No. Brennan was not an acceptable defense when your last defense had just been a complete setup in Miske. Care to keep going? Take a look at who Gibbons beat to get a title shot between losing to Greb in the eliminator and fighting Dempsey. The best names he beat were: Miske, Ashe, and Wiggins. Between losing his the 10 rounder to Greb and the elimination to Greb he somehow fought his way into HW title contention with wins over: Turner, Meehan, Wiggins, Walker, Korner, Williams, Jones, and Madden... Those were the best names he fought in that period. Any of those names ring a bell? Here, let me help: Greb had already beaten all of them and defeated Gibbons in their final two fights between 1920 and 1922 yet somehow in 1923 Gibbons is a better fit for Dempsey than Greb or Wills... Yeah, the only thing acceptable about the guys Dempsey was fighting was that they werent the most qualified candidates.
     
    SuzieQ49 likes this.