Who was the better heavyweight Tami Mauriello or Elmer a Ray?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by SuzieQ49, Jul 8, 2018.


  1. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    Mauriello was knocked out 30 seconds later. Does it matter? He was thoroughly outclassed by an aging champion. He looked stiff, uncoordinated, and mediocre in there. Ray probably would have cleaned his clock like he did to Savold. Mauriello was another one of long list of white contenders who hid behind the color line to secure his high rating beating white contenders, and when he did fight top black men (Bivins and Louis) he lost.
     
  2. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,722
    29,070
    Jun 2, 2006
    Mauriello had a leg problem which meant he couldn't back up.If Lewis could stop Ray, Mauriello had the capability to imo. On the Louis fight, Louis himself said it was his last great performance,the last time he had his full power.
     
    Pedro_El_Chef likes this.
  3. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,722
    29,070
    Jun 2, 2006
    That is the objective way to look at it.imo.
     
  4. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,568
    27,203
    Feb 15, 2006
    Look at pictures of Louis after he was hit.

    He was hurt a lot more in that fight, than he was by most of the people who put him down.

    He basically lashed out like a wounded tiger, with spectacular results.

    When you say that he hid behind the color line, who exactly do you mean?
     
  5. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    After he loss to number 1 rated Bivins, he didn’t fight another top black contender until getting a title shot vs Louis.

    After losing to Bivins, Mauriello surpassed Bivins on the rankings in 1944 despite never defeating Bivins in a rematch or beating someone who beat Bivins.

    Baksi beat Mauriello in 1944, then lost his higher rating for taking on a top black fighter in Walcott and Losing. While Mauriello padded his record against white opposition and didn’t lose his rating.

    Despite black men flocking the top of the ratings 1942-1946 Mauriello never defeated ANY of them

    1942 Ratings

    Champion Joe Louis

    1. Jimmy Bivins
    2. Tami Mauriello
    3. Turkey Thompson
    4. Roscoe Toles
    5. Harry Bobo
    6. Big Boy Brown
    7. Lee Savold
    8. Lou Brooks
    9. Tony Musto
    10. Joey Maxim

    So the number 1, number 3, number 4, number 5, number 6, and number 8 men were black, Mauriello never defeated any of them

    1943 ratings

    joe Louis*, Champion

    1. Jimmy Bivins
    2. Tami Mauriello
    3. Lee Q. Murray
    4. Curtis Sheppard
    5. Gus Dorazio
    6. Joe Baksi
    7. Joey Maxim
    8. Turkey Thompson
    9. Lee Savold
    10. Buddy Scott

    Again, the number 1, number 3, number 4, number 8 contenders were black, Mauriello never defeated any of them


    Let’s move to 1946

    1946

    Joe Louis, Champion

    1. Tami Mauriello
    2. Elmer Ray
    3. Jersey Joe Walcott
    4. Bruce Woodcock
    5. Lee Q. Murray
    6. Curtis Sheppard
    7. Melio Bettina
    8. Joe Baksi
    9. Joe Kahut
    10. Joey Maxim


    So Mauriello moves to the number 1 spot despite not defeating the number 2 or number 3 men who were black. But he did defeat the number 4 man, a white man....a very soft Bruce Woodcock, who padded his record in Europe with a bunch of ham n eggers


    Poor Baksi (defeated Mauriello) whom had the guts to take on top black fighters had moved all the day down to 8 because of losses to top black men, while Mauriello defeating soft white contenders like walking corpse nova and steamboat captain woodcock gave him the number 1 rating,


    Look at all those top black men who were in the top 5 from 1942-1946.....Bivins, Thompson, Ray, Walcott, Shepherd, Bobo, Toles....how many did Mauriello defeat? Answer 0


    I don’t know who Mauriellsos manager was, but he did a great job protecting his fighter from the superior black men and weaseling his way into a number 1 rating and easy pay day for Louis.


    Bottom line: pre 1960. If you were a white fighter, all you had to do was beat other white men and avoid the top black men and you would be guaranteed a title shot.
     
    Last edited: Jul 9, 2018
    Seamus likes this.
  6. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    Except Lewis stopped Ray in 1938. He never fought a prime mid 40s Ray. Are we talking about each man at their best here or not? The ray who beat Charles and Walcott
     
  7. FrankinDallas

    FrankinDallas FRANKINAUSTIN

    29,909
    36,678
    Jul 24, 2004
    Based on the evidence presented above, and the lack of film to the contrary, I declare Elmer Ray to be "The black Harry Greb" .
     
    mcvey likes this.
  8. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    I definitely think it’s pretty alarming how many top rated black men Mauriello avoided and it helped protect his ranking so he could fight louis. Baksi, Savold fought top black men and paid the price.
     
  9. FrankinDallas

    FrankinDallas FRANKINAUSTIN

    29,909
    36,678
    Jul 24, 2004
    TBH I'd never heard of Ray before this thread. Amazing how much random information about obscure boxers you guys have in your heads.
     
  10. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    Well he defeated two ATG fighters in Charles and Walcott when both men were in their primes, so it carries significant weight for me. Which is why I studied up on the man.

    I don’t believe Louis ducked him, but he unquestionably should have been given a title shot. Unfortunately the aging louis kind of sat on his title with only 1-2 defenses per year 1946-1948. He could have fit ray in there
     
    Seamus likes this.
  11. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,722
    29,070
    Jun 2, 2006
    Did the 26 years old Rays chin get better when he was in his mid 30's?
     
  12. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,568
    27,203
    Feb 15, 2006
    He didn't need to, he was not the champion.

    I would also say that Bivins was a more established contender when they fought, while Mauriello was seen as an up and coming contender, and some people thought that Mauriello deserved the nod. He was apparently on the verge of stopping Bivins at the end of their first fight.
    If you are going to play that game, then you would have to say that Mauriello fought a lot more dangerous contenders than Ray, who had a truly padded record.

    I would also dispute that a fighter is "padding their record" because the majority of the contenders that they figth are white. There were plenty of good white contenders around.
    Mauriello was not the champion at the end of the day, and he was under absolutely no obligation to fight other ranked contenders.

    Very few ranked contenders meet the majority of the other men in the rankings, with Jersey Joe Walcott being one of history's rare exceptions.

    Mauriello's management were merely showing sound judgment by taking the Woodcock fight.
     
  13. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,722
    29,070
    Jun 2, 2006
    How many ko'd Greb?
     
  14. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,722
    29,070
    Jun 2, 2006
    You have Box rec.
    How many of these rated black guys did Ray fight?
    Bivins
    Murray
    Franklin
    Brown
    Toles
    Walker
    Bobo
    Sheppard
    Thompson
    Thomas
     
    Last edited: Jul 10, 2018
    Man_Machine and janitor like this.
  15. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,568
    27,203
    Feb 15, 2006
    A pertinent question if Mauriello is being tarred and feathered for not fighting them!
     
    Man_Machine and mcvey like this.