Who was the better heavyweight Tami Mauriello or Elmer a Ray?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by SuzieQ49, Jul 8, 2018.


  1. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,722
    29,070
    Jun 2, 2006
    edward morbius likes this.
  2. FrankinDallas

    FrankinDallas FRANKINAUSTIN

    29,905
    36,669
    Jul 24, 2004
    11 guys ko'd Greb but the films were lost. Now go back to bed and get up the right side for once.
     
  3. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,722
    29,070
    Jun 2, 2006
    What makes you think I'm not in a good mood?
     
  4. FrankinDallas

    FrankinDallas FRANKINAUSTIN

    29,905
    36,669
    Jul 24, 2004
    I can feel the negative vibes from across the Atlantic.....
     
  5. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,722
    29,070
    Jun 2, 2006
    Impressive!
     
  6. edward morbius

    edward morbius Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,986
    1,262
    Sep 5, 2011
    Thanks for posting this. A lot of interesting info on Elmer Ray.

    I noticed that according to this article it was Ray who KO'd Burley, which does make more sense considering the size difference.

    Ray was in my opinion one of the outstanding contenders never to fight for a championship.

    Nice to know he had a positive post-fight life.
     
    mcvey likes this.
  7. edward morbius

    edward morbius Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,986
    1,262
    Sep 5, 2011
    "Walcott and Charles would go on to win the lineal heavyweight title"

    "Without that factoid"

    Aren't the two men later becoming champions just facts. Why dismiss either as a factoid?

    "Mauriello as being more deserving of a title shot than Ray"

    In September of 1946, yes. I don't think Louis merits any criticism for defending against Mauriello. He had been a contender for years. Ray didn't get his first big win until he took out Savold in August, 1946. Mauriello had already beaten Savold twice. The win over Walcott came in November. The win over Charles in 1947.

    But the issue in this thread is whether Ray or Mauriello was the better fighter. For me, it is pretty clear that Ray reached a much higher peak than Mauriello did. And I also think Mauriello was overrated in the Ring rankings to some extent. Who was the best he beat? Savold? Oma? Woodcock? Hindsight is 20/20 and all that, but with hindsight these were not the most dangerous foes out there.

    Ray managed wins over the best he fought, who were better than anyone Mauriello beat. Louis aside, Mauriello went 0-7 against Bivins, Lesnevich, and Baksi, the best he fought.
     
    SuzieQ49 likes this.
  8. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,731
    Sep 14, 2005
    Solid...and isn’t it alarming how many top 5 rated black men he managed to avoid fighting 1943-1947 after his loss to bivins?

    Agreed Mauriello was overrated in ring ratings, why was he rated above Baksi and Bivins, men who beat him?
     
  9. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,722
    29,070
    Jun 2, 2006
    In Ottey's book of Burley he says Ray,annoyed at Burley making him look silly, went for blood and Burely kod him with a single right hand Burley was under 160lbs at the time.I made a thread about it.

    "According to Harry Ottey ,in his excellent biography of Charley Burley ,which I took for holiday reading on my kindle.Burley, weighing under 160lbs ko'd the 200lbs plus Ray in a sparring session with a single right hand , this occurred when Ray got too frisky and wanted to put on a show for the spectators.After Burley made him look foolish by effortlessly slipping his big punches ,he grew frustrated and pushed Charley through the ropes. Burley wearing no head gear ,[he seldom did,] climbed back in the ring ,drew another big swing from the Violent one,and countered with a perfectly timed right hand that sparked him for several minutes. I recommend the book, it has a lot of detail and facts about Burley and the Murderers Row. "

    mcvey, Apr 8, 2017 Edit Report
     
  10. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,722
    29,070
    Jun 2, 2006
    1947
    JJoe Louis, Champion

    1. Jersey Joe Walcott
    2. Elmer Ray
    3. Lee Q. Murray
    4. Pat Comiskey
    5. Joe Baksi
    6. Tommy Gomez
    7. Joey Maxim
    8. Turkey Thompson
    9. Bruce Woodcock
    10. Phil Muscato
    Why was Ray rated above Thompson at the end of 47 when Thompson ko'd him in one round in March/April of that year?
     
  11. edward morbius

    edward morbius Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,986
    1,262
    Sep 5, 2011
    Thompson KO'd Ray in 1943, not 1947. Ray was rated higher by this time because he had beaten Walcott and Charles. I think Ray had gone something like 57-1 since that Thompson loss, while Thompson had suffered several losses.
     
    SuzieQ49 likes this.
  12. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,722
    29,070
    Jun 2, 2006
    Yes you're right and I'm wrong ,I think my point to Suze still stands though, a fighters status is always in a state of flux depending on their respective results.
     
  13. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,731
    Sep 14, 2005
    My point still stands. Muariello shamelessly hid behind the color line and would not fight top black men so he wouldn’t suffer a loss and lose his high rating.

    Still don’t understand why you criticize lastarza yet defend Mauriello!
     
  14. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,731
    Sep 14, 2005

    Yeah, Muariellos masquerade as the number 1 contender has become abundantly clear.....be a white heavyweight in the 1940s, defeat a few ranked white contenders, avoid the top ranked black men....book you get your title shot


    I spelled out pretty clearly in the rankings I posted 1942-1946 how little Muariello had actually done to earn number 1 status. Not only did he disgracefully avoid the top black men, but he also failed to beat the best white contender Joe Baksi. But Baksi got punished because he had the balls to take on Walcott while Mauriello didn’t. So Baksi missed the boat.

    But for a couple of posters to presume Muariello was on the same level or near it to Elmer Ray just seems bizare to me.
     
  15. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,568
    27,202
    Feb 15, 2006
    My point is that nobody knew that it was going to happen while Ray was a contender, so a win over Walcott or Charles when you had also lost against them, probably didn't look all that impressive.

    Mauriello's win over Lou Nova probably looked a lot more compelling at the time!
    Then we are on the same page with this.
    Again in hindsight.
    The best that Mauriello fought apart from obviously Louis would be Bob Pastor, who he held to a draw. Pastor was coming off wins over Franklin and Bivins, and was a 6-1 favorite over Mauriello, who was only in his sixth outing at heavyweight. It is said that Pastor was slated for a third meeting with Joe Louis in July of 1942 before this encounter.

    When Mauriello met Lou Nova, Lee Savold had already beaten him, and Savold would likely have got Joe Louis next on the strength of this win, had Louis not gone into the army. Mauriello then beat Lee Savold, and Lou Nova back to back. After this there was some talk of him being the interim champion instead of Bivins. The bottom line is that if Louis had not gone into the army, he might have crossed paths with Mauriello sooner. The likely candidates for his next fight would have been Savold and Mauriello.
     
    Pedro_El_Chef likes this.