Remove 3 weight divisions from boxing

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Jel, Jul 17, 2018.


Page 1 of 2
  1. Jel

    Jel Obsessive list maker Full Member

    7,830
    13,120
    Oct 20, 2017
    If you had license to do it, which weight divisions would you remove from boxing and why? You can choose three only.
     
    Jel, Jul 17, 2018
    Jel, Jul 17, 2018
    #1
    Rumsfeld likes this.
  2. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,517
    15,934
    Jul 19, 2004
    I'm tempted to say strawweight, junior fly, and junior bantam. Ideally I'd prefer to get rid of 8 or 9.

    But I think I'd settle on junior welter, junior middle, and super middle. Basta'd divisions be gone!
     
    Rumsfeld, Jul 17, 2018
    Rumsfeld, Jul 17, 2018
    #2
    BitPlayerVesti, Jel and White Trunks Black Trim like this.
  3. Jel

    Jel Obsessive list maker Full Member

    7,830
    13,120
    Oct 20, 2017
    That's why I limited it to three because the natural reaction is to remove anything that isn't one of the original 8!

    Personally, I think Cruiserweight has become an essential addition between Light-heavy and Heavy so I'd keep that even if I could get rid of all the other newer divisions.
     
    Jel, Jul 18, 2018
    Jel, Jul 18, 2018
    #3
    Rumsfeld likes this.
  4. Mr Icaman

    Mr Icaman 32-0 WBC Champ, Ring + Lineal HW Champ Full Member

    4,451
    3,429
    Aug 31, 2015
    Anything with a super in it..
     
    Mr Icaman, Jul 18, 2018
    Mr Icaman, Jul 18, 2018
    #4
    Reinhardt likes this.
  5. Reinhardt

    Reinhardt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,973
    19,008
    Oct 4, 2016
    Jr. Lightweight,,,,supermiddle, and pick a light fly or super fly weight
     
    Reinhardt, Jul 18, 2018
    Reinhardt, Jul 18, 2018
    #5
  6. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,533
    46,099
    Feb 11, 2005
    Heavyweight, Heavyweight and Heavyweight.
     
    Seamus, Jul 18, 2018
    Seamus, Jul 18, 2018
    #6
    InMemoryofJakeLamotta likes this.
  7. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    26,593
    17,671
    Apr 3, 2012
    108, 115, and 122.

    The talent pool gets deep where the medium sized humans are, hence 147, 154, and 160 are all deep divisions and needed.
     
    NoNeck, Jul 18, 2018
    NoNeck, Jul 18, 2018
    #7
    Seamus likes this.
  8. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    16,223
    11,694
    Sep 21, 2017
    Heavyweight, light heavyweight and middle weight.






    I kid. But I think boxing ought to go back to the 8 original weight divisions. Only keeping cruiserweight.
     
    InMemoryofJakeLamotta, Jul 18, 2018
    InMemoryofJakeLamotta, Jul 18, 2018
    #8
    Seamus likes this.
  9. Xplosive

    Xplosive Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,331
    9,939
    Jun 23, 2008
    The three smallest.
     
    Xplosive, Jul 18, 2018
    Xplosive, Jul 18, 2018
    #9
  10. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,517
    15,934
    Jul 19, 2004
    See, I think if you got rid of 140, 154, and 168 - we'd get much better match-ups at lightweight, welterweight, middleweight, and light heavyweight.
     
    Rumsfeld, Jul 18, 2018
    Rumsfeld, Jul 18, 2018
    #10
    Mr Icaman likes this.
  11. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,517
    15,934
    Jul 19, 2004
    Well, if I was going to keep one newer weight class, cruiserweight would be the one I kept, too.
     
    Rumsfeld, Jul 18, 2018
    Rumsfeld, Jul 18, 2018
    #11
  12. Mr Icaman

    Mr Icaman 32-0 WBC Champ, Ring + Lineal HW Champ Full Member

    4,451
    3,429
    Aug 31, 2015
    They seem to be a bit of over kill in these areas, too many weight bullies here because its not hard to drop those pounds..

    Guys seem to be able to go up and down at will...
     
    Mr Icaman, Jul 18, 2018
    Mr Icaman, Jul 18, 2018
    #12
  13. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    26,593
    17,671
    Apr 3, 2012
    It might not happen that way. The mandatories and top rated boxers might sit of their rankings waiting for title shots, with fewer belts available. A lot of the best match-ups in those divisions have happened in the last few years or are slated to, so there isn't much to complain about.
     
    NoNeck, Jul 18, 2018
    NoNeck, Jul 18, 2018
    #13
  14. Longhhorn71

    Longhhorn71 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,714
    3,455
    Jan 6, 2007
    Wilfredo Gomez made a living beating up guys at Jr. Feather. Too bad prime Ruben Olivares wasn't around
    when the ABC's started up the Jr. FW Division.
     
    Longhhorn71, Jul 18, 2018
    Longhhorn71, Jul 18, 2018
    #14
  15. Jel

    Jel Obsessive list maker Full Member

    7,830
    13,120
    Oct 20, 2017
    We really don't need weight divisions below 112 pounds so that's strawweight and light flyweight out.

    And super middleweight should go. It's a nonsense weight class that's added little (imo) and hurt the middleweight and light heavyweight divisions, reducing the talent pools in both.

    As the oldest of the jnr/super weight classes I'd keep jnr lightweight, jnr welter and jnr middle - the first two in particular have history going back to the 30s.

    I'd get rid of jnr bantam if I could. At least jnr feather has Wilfredo Gomez and fights like Barrera-Morales as part of its history. But jnr bantam stays at the expense of strawweight and jnr fly.

    But I'd happily keep all 17 in favour of one world champion per division.
     
    Last edited: Jul 18, 2018
    Jel, Jul 18, 2018
    Jel, Jul 18, 2018
    #15
    Longhhorn71 and Mendoza like this.
Page 1 of 2