Carl Froch sets the record straight on who would have won if he fought Calzaghe

So Kovalevs 2 best wins are over a former Calzaghe victim who you deride JC for beating. ....but this came 8 years after JC did.

And the second is against a guy who lost to said JC victim 4 years after JC beat him.....

Am I correct?

 

why do you think you misquoting me is correct?

Cmon pal you cant be this desperate. its like "new calzaghe" Clev/Kovalev all over again, but i'm doing the carrying u back to yourcorner.

 

Not that anybody should be blamed for avoiding Germany. I think fights in Texas are a joke and they look completely legitimate compared to Germany ha ha.

 

Anyone remember when Sven complained to the ref that Robin Reid was " hitting him " ? In all fairness to Ottke I will always respect him if only for putting Mundine lights out lol

 

Yes the only fight that has sent me to sleep whilst watching it.

Horrible.

 

Very true.

 

So by Kovalev beating a former Hopkins victim and a 50 year old Hopkins he "cleaned" out a division?

Somebody needs to tell Beterbiev, Gvozdyk, Bivol and Stevenson.

 

hopkins had an illustrious title career, do you think title career fighters arent worth cleaning out?

most of these guys werent prominent until kovie had ward lined up, apart from adonis.

 

They've always been prominent, a lot better than 50 yo Hopkins and Pascal.

 

theres no point in you lying, you are talking to me.

 

Yes I'm talking to you.....a guy who has no interest in boxing outside of **** staining Calzaghe threads.

If Kovalev has cleaned out a division by beating a former Calzaghe victim and Pascal who lost to an older Hopkins......why do you claim Calzaghes victory over Hopkins was in a word weak or poor?

 

with lies, as pointed out above. You arent even reading what you are replying to judging from the random content there. You must be extremely frustrated.

You are not on a winner here pal, try to get back on track.

 

I didnt.

Why on earth would I say calzaghes best win is poor? It appears you want me to say that, thats clear. Perhaps you realised you ran out of steam on our last argument, and are inventing a new one I am not arguing for? Thats just really underhand dude.

You just full of lies, get your life back on track and come back to me when you are ok, I cant reply to lies without pointing out you are a liar, and I dont like doing that to a pal.

 

lol says you! You lie all the time

 

JC's victory over Hopkins > Kovalev victory over Pascal and Hopkins.....yet Kovalev "cleaned" The division out.