If GGG moved up...

If he moves up without fighting saunders or the 1 or 2 other big names theres only 2 legit reasons why he should.

1. Megafight with a bigger name either money wise,legacy wise or both.

2. He has trouble making 160 still

 

Hopkins run at 160 was far weaker.

 

He's proven nothing at 160 and has fought FAR worse opposition than that you claim Golovkin faced.

 

it is if your slower than you were.. Pmsl u don't gauge it on 1 fight either in this case...He'd of tko'd Canelo 3/4 yrs ago

 

Cant believe a boxing fan uses this thought process or classes it as accurate...

 

There's nothing to suggest Charlo is better than Alvarez, Jacobs, prime Murray, prime Macklin, Lemeiux, Brook.

His best win is who.. Austin Trout? Apparently he got lucky in that fight too lol

It's really laughable to even suggest Golovkin is ducking some unproven mouthy guy that'll probably never beat the best middleweights.

American have not exactly produced top middleweights during the last 10 years have they

Charlo should face Jacobs, and IF he beats Jacobs. that's a Big IF.. then he'd deserve his shot at the main man. Right now he's a total nobody. Golovkin gains nothing by KO'ing him , afterwards these same haters that are calling for him to face Charlo , will be quick to ridicule Charlo as GGG's opposition, that's how these desperate weirdos like @The Akbar One work!

 

He's 36 years old. Would just be unfortunate that he took off when MW finally got interesting buuuut he is 36 and winning up at 168 is a notch as well so tough to complain too much.

As I always say, you "ducked" every fighter you never faced! Don't care for the term very much.

 

More that there is a pretty much "needed" rematch with Jacobs still. Saunders has people giddy. Also Derev and Murata. It's unquestionably noticeably better the last two years-ish than it was the previous many.

 

The remains of Degale...you are sorely out of touch mate or something worse, Degale is & always has been a joke!

 

Oh really ha ha ha based on which of his past MW fights ...All ears Pal!

 

yeh but i am askiong what evidence is there to base the clain he can beat elites on. i think thats a fair question., which is never answered here.

therefore i think the most you can say about him and elites is that, like me, you trust he can beat them.

regarding his move to SMW should it transpire, how do you tihnk it will go? I predict a late KO of world class CHunky!

 

You think everyone ages exactly the same?? Do you think Froch and GGG have the same style?? WTF kind of gauge is that ??? Your lost son

 

carl froch is an extreme example to be fair, few compare to him in terms of gameness.

 

A gauge based on reality opposed to your arbitrary assessment based on biased personal opinion.

Both Froch and Golovkin were come forwarders who didn't have the best defense. By 35 Froch had been in way more harder fights than Golovkin which means he had more miles on the clock yet nobody was calling on him to retire rather than face Groves in back to back fight at 37 years old
Why was that? Because people had more confidence in Froch's ability than they have in Golovkins.
You're worried that a guy like Charlo , who is a lesser fighter than Groves , will give GGG a pasting , so you want him to pack it in and retire.. lol haha!!

And this comes right after GGG pulverized vanes martirosyan in only 2 rounds , so that tells me you know just like i do that bully boy GGG is only good enough to beat smallies and C levellers.
Decent guys like Sergiy and Big Charlo come along and he flees the scene and you're perfectly ok with that since you know he's not a true ATG.

 

Jacobs would beat Charlo no probs..Your assessment is shocking..Did Froch have anywhere near the am fights GGG had, and no Froch boxed more than GGG..GGG don't give you a break..Your assessment is pathetic..If Sergiy dominates when GGG hangs them up you will start pulling him apart too, instead of calling him decent, that'll change to suit the book...Your a brainwashed illiterate