Carl Froch sets the record straight on who would have won if he fought Calzaghe

you theory is that he jumped deliberately to weaker.....but your theory is wrong, he was big for mw.

the erratic glen johnson remains the body of your argument - good luck with that.

 

i already know its five. stop writing crap, pal, or you will mislead people on here cheers.


but are right that joes calzaghes best win started as a super welter, nice one you are pal to me if not to joe making him look worse.

 

Johnson went 32-0 at 160, beating only 8 men with winning records.

Johnson went 5-6 at 168.

Johnson then went 13-7-2 at 175.....but became a champion.

My theory regarding Ward is that he was 175 in amateurs then drained to 160 to gain an advantage.

 

Boone was his 7th pro fight at 160.

And Wards best win started at 154 and his second best win was against a guy who's best win was against a previous Calzaghe victim.....Only 8 years later.

 

yeah as i said the erratic johnson is your only case, i am glad you are trying to milk it of every possible crumb of evidence as your argument for SMW being stronger than LHW and MW.

I applud your zeal for your theory that SMW is stronger because Glen Johnson found it so.

 

I have no wish to continue debating something you are clearly wrong about. You are wrong, some of the bouts before boone were at SMW.

PLease stop it as you are misinforming some readers here, I've already told you - you must learn to listen, pal.

ah you are referring to ward first title fight being better than joes best win ever. thats true, well pointed out pal, ward eclipsed joes entire career cumulative effort in his first title bout.

but kessler is clearly not wards best win. kov1 kov 2 dawson froch are clearly better. Joes cumulative 20 year career best effort is wards 5th best win AND his first ever title win, ok pal, you better close shop now.

 

Well......that is the point im making.....if I'm wrong prove it.

 

What weight was Ward v Boone at?

 

prove that ....Glen JOhnson is not proof that SMW wasnt weaker?

i dunno, glen johnson is such a sweepingly strong argument covering the whole of SMW history.

 

you've already looked it up, why dont you tell me? It'd save me doing it again, and I dont hold onto facts once the argument is over.

 

Well it's on you to prove I'm wrong.

Glen Johnson is a great example, as to is Woods.....as to is Reggie Johnson....

 

At what weight did they fight?

 

look it up , its MW i tihnk, but you need to check yourself to be sure. I've already told you to check it, please hurry if it bothers u.

 

reggie barely if ever fought at SMW.

You've already been told why woods doesnt work, he was green as a SMW.

My question to you is why you are pretending your failed argument work. Dont you have faith in Glen Johnson as your sweeping proof that SMW is better than LHW? You should be proud of the part of your argument that works, not destory it with failed ones. c'mon pal i am trying to sort you out.

 

Ok well what fight into Wards career was it?

If certainly wasn't fight number 5 was it....