Handspeed is the most overrated thing in boxing

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by tinman, Jul 30, 2018.


  1. tinman

    tinman Loyal Member Full Member

    36,373
    28,917
    Feb 25, 2015
    Carlos Monzon and Alexis Arguello are as slow as can be.

    Lehlo Ledwaba was by far Manny Pacquiaos fastest opponent, but was the easiest notable fight of his career. A far slower Marquez gave Pacquiao much tougher fights.

    Tommy Hearns had the fastest hands of the fab 4. But you would struggle to find anybody who rates him over the other 3.

    Give me timing, good positioning and power all day long. It's very rare to find a great fighter with featherfists. I can think of Pernell Whitaker, Andre Ward and little else. And guys like that have to make it up for it with extreme skill levels.

    Almost all top level fighters usually hit harder than their opponents. Or at the very least have average power for their weight. The same cant be said of speed. Some excellent fighters have slow hands. We see it all the time.
     
  2. OpinionOfACasual

    OpinionOfACasual Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    5,111
    3,981
    May 3, 2017
    Spence is a great example for me.

    He's not slow, but he's not a lightning fast puncher.


    Just incredible positioning and timing allows him to land so heavy and often.
     
    tinman likes this.
  3. Okin129

    Okin129 ... Full Member

    2,303
    2,119
    Mar 24, 2017
    When somebody thinks it's the most importang thing in boxing, then he is clearly overrating handspeed but it's
    a great addition to the skillset of an already fundamentally sound fighter and can make a big difference.
     
    J Jones likes this.
  4. tinman

    tinman Loyal Member Full Member

    36,373
    28,917
    Feb 25, 2015
    It makes a small difference I think. But if the other guy has more power and better positioning then all the handspeed in the world will make little difference.
     
    DoubleJab666 likes this.
  5. Okin129

    Okin129 ... Full Member

    2,303
    2,119
    Mar 24, 2017
    Generally it makes a small difference but it can make a big difference in certain situations like counterpunching or fighting against a slick opponent who is hard to hit clean but even in that situations things like reaction time and positioning are still more important.
     
    tinman likes this.
  6. tinman

    tinman Loyal Member Full Member

    36,373
    28,917
    Feb 25, 2015
    Remember Golvokin vs Monroe Jr.

    GGG is slow for a top level fighter. And Monroe is a featherfisted slick southpaw. A lot guys going into that fight were saying Monroe would be too slick and push GGG to the limit on the cards.

    But GGG had FAR more power, timing, and positioning. He cut the ring and timed him. And the fight was extremely easy for him.
     
    BCS8 and Okin129 like this.
  7. Okin129

    Okin129 ... Full Member

    2,303
    2,119
    Mar 24, 2017
    Yes, GGG was far superior in almost everything, when things are equal it can make a difference but when you are
    fighting against a superior boxer it won't help you to win the fight, and when you have fast hands but no power
    like Amir Khan it doesn't make a difference like it does with someone like Corrie Sanders who overwhelmed his
    opponents with handspeed but also power which certainly made a difference for him, imagine Corrie Sanders without his handspeed and he wouldn't have been as dangerous anymore.
     
  8. ashishwarrior

    ashishwarrior I'm vital ! Full Member

    34,379
    11,866
    Apr 19, 2010
    Your breaking Khan fans sole argument in boxing
    Timing beats speed



    but but them fast hands though
     
  9. brown-bomber

    brown-bomber Member Full Member

    441
    163
    Sep 15, 2012
    Leonard had the fastest hands out of the fab 4.
     
    Pimp C, Badbot, MURK20 and 1 other person like this.
  10. J Jones

    J Jones Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,828
    1,414
    Jul 19, 2017
    To quote Roy Jones, “You must have forgot.”
     
    MURK20 likes this.
  11. BoxingABC1

    BoxingABC1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,563
    4,782
    Sep 21, 2016
    it sounds so cliche but timing really does typically beat speed
     
    tinman and DoubleJab666 like this.
  12. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    61,133
    23,692
    Jul 21, 2012
    Getting off on an opponent quicker then they can get off on you is one of the best advantages you can have in the ring.
    Handspeed is in no way overrated.
     
    MURK20 likes this.
  13. Octolony shore

    Octolony shore Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,089
    2,164
    Sep 14, 2016
    I'll take power, timing, punch resistance, stamina, footwork, heart, boxing intelligence, tough skin, nice shorts, boots with tassles on, basically anything over hand speed.
     
    tinman and MURK20 like this.
  14. DoubleJab666

    DoubleJab666 Dot, dot, dot... Full Member

    11,844
    15,621
    Nov 9, 2015
    Hand speed is the cherry on the cake, but the cake itself is footwork - which is one key element of to timing imho. No point firing out combos the speed of a humming bird's wings if they hit thin air...
     
    tinman and Birmingham like this.
  15. lepinthehood

    lepinthehood When I'm drinking you leave me well alone banned Full Member

    52,105
    23,327
    Aug 27, 2011
    Quick feet are often better.
     
    tinman likes this.