Fury v Wilder makes sense for both sides

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by andrewa1, Jul 30, 2018.


Should Fury and Wilder fight in December

  1. Yes

    18 vote(s)
    56.3%
  2. No

    14 vote(s)
    43.8%
  1. Sephiroth Rising 7

    Sephiroth Rising 7 'No tears please!' banned Full Member

    9,483
    8,779
    Sep 27, 2016
    If Wilder wins he'll be considered as the guy who beat the real Champ and his stock will skyrocket.

    15 million is 11 million pounds for a unification which Hearn estimated had the potential to be bigger than Lewis Tyson which in this day and age with social media it is very feasible. So it can be considered crack money when we look at what other fighters have received in super fights involving unification.

    GGG rejected 10 million which would have been his highest purse and many on here said it was a disgrace

    [url]https://www.boxingforum24.com/threads/canelos-team-offering-golovkin-a-flat-flee-is-a-disgrace-to-boxing.578319/[/url]

    Even Marquez conceded that offering a flat fee to a fighter one method of ducking

    Marquez: Canelo's Flat Fee Offer is a Way To Avoid Golovkin!

    They are really punishing Gennady Golovkin [by offering a flat fee] .... because it's just a way to avoid to Golovkin, it's a way of saying we do not want the fight. We are not going to pay you that much, would you like to accept it?" Go ahead. Logically they can generate $200 or 300 million [from the pay-per-view event], which is just an estimate," Marquez told Golpe a Golpe.
     
    Sandman_ likes this.
  2. Sandman_

    Sandman_ Undisputed Full Member

    5,178
    6,749
    Feb 20, 2009
    Looking forward to seeing a big fight for the lineal (and real) heavyweight championship of the world.

    Will go down in New York, the capital of the world.

    The winner will be top dog of the heavyweight division & able to demand purse parity with Joshua.

    Joshua's legacy will be badly tarnished if he doesn't claim lineage.
     
  3. latineg

    latineg user of dude wipes Full Member

    22,077
    16,732
    Jun 4, 2009
    Great post, agree with most of your posts about this fight raising Wilders negotiating power should he take out Tyson.

    I would love this match up, before his layoff i would of guessed Tyson but currently i am leaning Wilder unless Fury can show more of his older form in his next fight. Regardless, great match up!
     
    andrewa1 likes this.
  4. Brighton bomber

    Brighton bomber Loyal Member Full Member

    31,316
    29,509
    Apr 4, 2005
    Come on lets be realistic here you've got the 2 biggest BS talkers in the division talking about a fight. The chances of this happening is as likely as Lewis coming out of retirement and fighting Vitali.

    Even if it's true the winner doesn't get 50% vs Joshua not a chance unless it does very, very well on PPV. Joshua will remain the A-side and will demand the bigger share and rightly so.

    But it would give the winner more leverage and increase the pressure on Joshua and Hearn to compromise more from their current stance and give them a percentage and not a flat fee.

    But as I said it ain't happening, I mean Fury is also calling for Chisora to fight Wilder lol.

    And former unified heavyweight champion, Tyson Fury, would fully support a showdown between Chisora and Wilder.

    “I would be the first to back him in a world title fight,” Fury said to The Sun.

    “I’ll back the campaign, let’s get a campaign going where we get Dereck Chisora a world heavyweight championship around his waist.

    “The guy deserves it, he’s a warrior, he’ll fight anybody, he’s been on the road, he’s fought the best in the world, he’s still going – even when people write him off.”
     
    Guybino likes this.
  5. andrewa1

    andrewa1 Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    7,005
    2,071
    Apr 8, 2013
    Come on, you can do better than this, you are usually a good and reasonable poster. It makes sense for them to do. Maybe it doesn't happen, but there's no reason not to think there isnt a good likelihood.

    And, I have trouble imagining this fight not doing bofo money if it's in GB. Fury was a draw, it will be massively hyped, and both of them will be good at promoting it. If it's not comparable in earnings to AJ Povetkin I'll be surprised.

    Unless the box office dissappoints, the winner will have definitely earned a 50/50 split with AJ. Resume will about the same as AJ, and drawing power in the same ballpark. Wlad gave Haye 50% with only the drawing power in the same ballpark.
     
    Sephiroth Rising 7 likes this.
  6. Pablo_p

    Pablo_p Member Full Member

    156
    3
    Apr 22, 2015
    Notice how fast & early they're making this fight to undercut aj & hearn & make them look like major ducks while they promote the fight as the real fight

    If this fight really gets made AJ name will be all over the promotion

    Also just in time to make that potential april date & whoever wins can come with major bargaining chips & bragging rights

    They've already started the collaborative smear campaign ;););)
     
  7. Guybino

    Guybino Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,584
    1,691
    Mar 6, 2011
    Wilder vs Fury.

    I wonder how many times these 2 will mention AJ in the build up. It could even end up with both of them hugging in the middle of the ring whispering in each others ears insults about AJ.

    "Tyson you are so much braver than that "coward" AJ"

    "no Deontay, you are braver than that body builder"

    "yes Tyson, we are so brave, the bravest in all da yulaverse"

    Both are envious of the man in the most insecure/obvious way.
     
    Vykus likes this.
  8. Mitch87

    Mitch87 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,561
    5,458
    Jul 29, 2018
    The fight doesnt make sense for Wilder unless he's certain that Fury is washed up.

    Wilder could make much more if he took AJ's offer. Wilder would even make more money if he fought Whyte instead of Fury too
     
    Last edited: Jul 31, 2018
  9. Mr Icaman

    Mr Icaman 32-0 WBC Champ, Ring + Lineal HW Champ Full Member

    4,451
    3,429
    Aug 31, 2015
    It makes no sense at all for Fury because at this stage he still has plans for getting all of his belts back and losing to Wilder will pretty much derail those plans..

    Fury is actually taking a ultra conservative route which means he wants to make sure he is at his best before fighting the top guys..

    Fighting Wilder at this stage of his comeback would most likely end up as a ko loss..

    Really you have two of the biggest bull**** talkers in the division making themselves staying relevant which is both of their bread and butter..
     
  10. derrick

    derrick 6ft4 215 bring it on Full Member

    7,534
    215
    Dec 31, 2004
    I'm not sure I would rush Fury into a fight with Wilder that fast. I respect what Fury has overcome. And I think he needs to be in the 240's before he fights Wilder. Fury needs to take a few more fights and maybe look at taking on Joshua ,Wilder and big baby Miller which I think is a top 5 figher already maybe next summer. I like what I see from Fury so far because he has the skills to win back those belts when he is at his best. I'm not sure who Wilder will fight next but I would love to see him fight Ortiz again which is a very risky fight. Joshua has already ducked Ortiz so I give Wilder credit for fighting Ortiz but he almost got his ass knocked out.
     
  11. minemax

    minemax Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,993
    4,783
    Nov 10, 2017
    Yes, it does. Especially for Wilder. Who should (if he really believes in himself :smile:) definitely grab this opportunity as soon as possible. Because Tyson Fury will become more and more dangerous for his with each fight.
     
    Holler likes this.
  12. Holler

    Holler Doesn't appear to be a paid matchroom PR shill Full Member

    13,230
    25,243
    Mar 12, 2018
    Great OP but just on these points:

    We've seen one, frankly terrible outing from Fury so far. He looked a million miles from someone who could even credibly share the ring with Wilder, let alone beat him. He signed a 4 fight deal with Warren and BT sport with the express intention of fighting warm ups till next year. The next guy isn't dangerous enough to tell us much. He looks slimmer in latest phots but are we expected to believe they think he's so far ahead of schedule that he and his rookie trainer are even mentally capable of the pressure of a Vegas fight for the WBC belt?

    If Fury did take this it would be an implicit acknowledgment that he and his team don't think he can sustain the pro lifestyle for any length of time and they're getting a big cash fight sooner rather than later accordingly. Hearn would block the path to AJ with a Bellew or Whyte who Fury may not be able to cope with so he's taking Wilder option instead.

    Point 7, I think the loser is in a bad place. Fury would lose his 'lineal' last shred of the Dortmund kudos as well as his unbeaten record and the mystique he's built along with it. Wilder his record, belt and the embarassment of losing to a guy who was 26 stone not so long ago. Wilder would have a rematch clause most likely however.

    I don't think it happens. If it does I think it says something about Fury, either supremely confident or getting a big cash out before the wheels inevitably fall off. I'd say the latter in that case.
     
    andrewa1 likes this.
  13. Vykus

    Vykus ɹoolɟ ǝɥʇ ɯoɹɟ ʍǝᴉʌ ǝɥʇ Full Member

    2,263
    2,675
    Feb 21, 2018
    Whilst both will claim bragging rights, I doubt this fight makes much more money in the US than an ordinary Wilder fight, thus not having the desired monetary effect in negotiations. Fight would need to happen in the UK to both draw attention and fans away from Joshua/Matchroom, and increase their bargianing power. Holding this fight in the US would be a dead horse and promote minimal change in their payday negotiations.
     
    andrewa1 likes this.
  14. andrewa1

    andrewa1 Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    7,005
    2,071
    Apr 8, 2013
    Actually, I just read it would be in Vegas on american ppv, not in GB. That potentially undercuts alot of my argument. Its bold, and if it works out well and sells, it would strengthen my points. But neither fighter has been on ppv in us before. And per Ward kovalev, being a great fight doesn't ensure it will sell. If it pulls a Ward kovalev, AJ would still have a (still lowered, at least) negotiating advantage in leverage.

    On your points, for 6, yeah, that is my suspicion, re Fury being shot or not ready. But A. maybe he really can't beat a Whyte at this stage, so why not cash out in a bigger fight and B maybe looks are deceptive and he really is approaching 100% back. Vitali came back better than ever with no tune ups, a longer time off, and was older and injured. I can't rule out that Fury will be a comparable fighter.

    For 7, it will decrease interest for sure, but not eliminate. There would be more interest in AJ fighting the loser of that fight than any other opponent (if he beat the winner beforehand, or if he lost to the winner and didn't want an immediate rematch). Kind of like the interest in Foreman Ali. Could lead to a great story.
     
    Holler likes this.
  15. andrewa1

    andrewa1 Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    7,005
    2,071
    Apr 8, 2013
    I just saw it's apparently being negotiated for Vegas. Bold, but a mistake, imo. If it falls flat on ppv, the winner will have closed the resume/respect gap, but without the financial gap closed, it won't put them too much better off in overall purse leverage.