I always said Kovalev was NEVER really that good Golovkin exposed him in camp

Golovkin was dropped with a body shot from a sparring partner as well supposedly. I knew he was never that good.

 

Wtf are you on about? I'm talking about your comparison of Charlo with Rubio and Ouma.

 

So are you saying Charlo has been beating top tier opposition?......Oh Hi please tell me you are not that dense.

 

Yes so far Charlo has beaten sub par opposition outside of Trout in a fight he arguably lost.

Has Charlo the potential to be much better then yes he has but so far no.

 

I'm asking are you comparing Charlo's accomplishments with Ouma and Rubio at 160 or career?

 

At 160?

No although Rubio has the Lemieux win, went 9 with Pavlik, although he was utterly destroyed by GGG in 2.

At the moment Rubio beating Lemieux trumps anything at 160 than the cans that Charlo has been feasting on.

 

?? Answer my question. Charlo has accomplished more in his career than Rubio and Ouma combined.

 

So far I wouldn't say so at all or at least it's not cut and dry.

Getting a gift over Trout....a guy who ever other fighter at top level he fought he was beaten more convincingly by doesn't really hold much water especially when he's on a can crushing run at 160.

Again Rubio as it stands today has a better 160 resume.....just saying.

 

Lemiuex is overrated and one dimensional, so that win wasn't that big in my eyes.

 

Tbh I personally don't rate Trout. Now I'm not saying Lemieux is great but I'd rate a victory over him better than Trout, especially in the manner it was done.

I thought Canelo, Hurd, the Cuban all beat Trout more decisive....especially when it could be argued Charlo lost.

I think it's hard to compare fighters who have retired to guys who are getting hype today.

For arguments sake both Ouma at 154 and Rubio at 154/160 would be Charlo's best opponents to date.

 

Hahahahaha here come all the experts

 

Lmao over a young Lemieux who got outboxed by Alcine? Foh

 

"Supposedly" equates to never being that good?

Care to explain?

 

But it's still far better than anything Charlo has done....in fact he's feasted on bums worse imo than the bums utter deplorables like yourself call out GGG for feasting on.....yet Charlo is legit in your eyes.....

Who has Charlo beaten at 160 better than a win over Lemieux?

 

Never said he has a better resume at 160. Do you have reading comprehension problems? His wins over Trout and J-Rock trumps Rubio+Ouma's combined. Bu bu bu he lost to Chavez Jr and PAVLIK DOE.