This. Knowing what we now know about Jones chin, this would be a fight in which Jones would be winning round after round yet we'd feel GGG was one good combo away from pulling out a victory.
I never said they were. But the fact remains that Roid was never subjected to any kind of steroid testing for the first 11 years of his career, let alone anything as stringent as random blood and urine testing under VADA, whereas GGG has been tested for steroids for all of his career, fighting all over the globe in many different countries and many times in different countries, and he's been subject to stringent random blood and urine testing under VADA for numerous fights, and he's never popped dirty for steroids like Roid has which is something we shouldn't just ignore if we're going to be fair to GGG (even just a little bit) when we're pitting him against a proven steroid cheat in a hypothetical match up who wasn't being subjected to any kind of steroid testing for the first 11 years of his career, right?
2 of my Favourite Fighters both Greats....Roy get's his Chin tested Big time....Golovkin fights a Fighter that is fast and his use of the Angles while fighting was incredible that in itself would frustrate Golovkin....can not split it if it goes the Distance possibly Roy...if it ends in a TKO Golovkin....Draw for me.!!!!
It’s funny watching all these casuals try to talk about Roy as if he didn’t have a jab or something. Watch the Vinny Paz fight and watch Roy pump the jab just as Genny did against Canelo. 1. It was more accurate. 2. It was far more damaging and devastating. 3. Way more speed. Roy always wanted to take a guys head off. He didn’t rely on a jab. He could land shits from crazy angles like a Prince Naz. You people need to start learning what it is you’re talking about. Roy’s levels above Genny.
Jones Jr has a chin like ****ing Amir Khan and you seriously think he could survive the 12 rounds with GGG who not only is a massive puncher, with a granite chin, he's also technically elite. No matter how good Jones Jr skills are., you HAVE to have a solid chin to beat Golovkin - FACT
Is Tarver a future Hall of famer was asked on this thread here [url]https://www.boxingforum24.com/threads/is-antonio-tarver-a-hall-of-famer.518677/[/url] and your very answer was
What does that mean? Alot of fighters can be good and have good careers and not be hof worthy tarver fits that profile. Kovalev is a good fighter but he's not hof worthy either. Both of them are better than Jacobs that's for sure.
It's unfortunate that Antonio Tarver mostly fought in an era were ex soviet union fighters couldn't turn pro, cause obviously he'd have losses to them just like he did in the amateurs. Tarver fought Zero ex soviet union fighters in the pros after getting his ass kicked in the Olympics by them, thats the only difference between him and Jacobs in your minds lets be real. The way you muppets throw Jacobs under the bus and try to call him a bum when he's always been a good fighter is ridiculous
what's so crap about Jacobs then???! Spit it out. You talk rubbish. He lost to two elite guys in Golovkin ( close fight as well) and Pirog. Two Excellent fighters who have never been beaten. Apart from that he's done nothing wrong and has a crazy high KO ratio.
Who has Jacobs beat? Just because he ran ggg close means nothing. His resume is trash compared to tarvers period end of discussion.
He's the only Black American fighter I see you hating on. All just to **** on GGG cause you hate GGG. He has a better resume yes but he has losses to worse fighters than Jacobs has losses to - Eric Harding a bum, Glen Johnson, and Chad Dawson.
You claim you know alot about me for someone who just joined. We all know you're an banned troll alt you're not fooling anyone here. I picked Jacobs to be brutally koed by ggg hell I picked him to lose to quillen to.
You're agenda couldn't be more apparent there's a reason why you keep getting banned. Your ass aint even from Russia you damn cuck. It's embarrassing.