Is Froch Wards best win?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Liquorice, Aug 5, 2018.


  1. Elvizzz

    Elvizzz Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,035
    550
    Jun 29, 2008
    Just for the record... Prime Froch would never have beaten prime Kessler
     
    bailey and Liquorice like this.
  2. Cafe

    Cafe Sitzpinkler Full Member

    38,516
    8,077
    Sep 2, 2011
    Has to be Froch considering he beat an untrained, alcoholic version of Kovalev. Unless you count the first fight as a W for Ward, then it's Kovalev if you take H2H ability over resume.
     
    Liquorice likes this.
  3. LD Boxer-Puncher

    LD Boxer-Puncher Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,796
    1,192
    May 10, 2017
    You're going to get some people who vote for fighters out of bias as they're fans yes, but I would think there are less casuals here than there would be elsewhere and so true boxing fans are just going to be honest about who is better surely?

    I'm not even a big Froch fan to be honest. I wanted Groves to beat him both times, wanted Calzaghe to come back and slap him (literally), for all the chat about how he was better than him etc etc, so hoping you're not calling me biased.
    And I'm definitely not saying he's in any way better than Andre Ward, we were talking about Kessler and Froch, who are not on the same tier as Ward.
    I'm one of the few here who seem to have had Ward winning the first Kovalev fight
     
  4. African Cobra

    African Cobra The Right Honourable Lord President of the Council banned Full Member

    27,342
    10,125
    May 29, 2007
    No Sir I am not calling you biased at all. The point I am making is that on this forum there are lots of people biased against Ward and pro Froch. Some of these people are trying to diminish Ward’s victories over Kovalev after what happened at the weekend saying Kovalev was not that good etc. It’s revisionist history at work.
     
  5. Liquorice

    Liquorice Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    5,515
    7,684
    May 13, 2018
    How did u score it? I had Kessler out working him 7-5.. Froch even looked dejected & beaten afterwards. Hard fight but Kessler did enough. Punch stats (though tho they don't always tell the full story) back that up too..
     
    Last edited: Aug 8, 2018
  6. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    43,740
    13,117
    Apr 1, 2007
    I'd like to know what everyone think of this?

    This content is protected
     
  7. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,221
    5,875
    Apr 30, 2006
    Agreed
     
  8. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,982
    3,112
    Dec 11, 2009
    Judging by your answer I dont think you are too knowledgeable on the division then and that isnt being said to dismiss you. Many didnt know and were fooled by a hyped competition where they got to see who the fighters were
    But thats not the case in this scenario
    See this is where you dont know the division.
    How was Frochs level of opponents higher lol?
    Pascal wasnt a top SMW
    Taylor wasnt a top SMW
    Dirrell wasnt a top SMW
    Abraham wasnt a top SMW and coming off a loss
    G Johnson had about as many losses at SMW than he did wins and was boiled down and faded.

    With Kessler he beat Beyer who was a 3 time SMW champ with a better SMW resume than any of the above at that time
    Mundine between SMW title reigns who had done more at the weight than the above
    Siaca had a greater win at SMW than any of the above and mixed in a higher class than any of the above at SMW at that time
    Sartison who was an undefeated SMW champ
    Haussler had done more at SMW than the above at that time
    Lucas had done more at SMW than the above at that time

    Just to give you a bit of a run down and Kessler had mixed in higher company at that time
    What like Hopkins beating Jones?
    Are you being serious? Groves was no more than British level when he fought Froch. The only reason that fight looked so good is because of how Froch struggled at that level. That was a lower level than Kessler fought at the majority of time and also that was long after the Ward fight which is what we are discussing when Ward fought the fighters in question.
    I am exaggerating but what you are saying is like saying C Mitchell should be rated higher for his win over Hopkins than Jones for example
     
  9. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,982
    3,112
    Dec 11, 2009
    I dont know mate. Kessler after that loss beat Froch and Froch I read had elbow problems when he fought Ward and read he couldnt get his glove up properly
     
    Liquorice likes this.
  10. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,982
    3,112
    Dec 11, 2009
    Thank you Nonito
    Often when facts are laid out it upsets posters who then try and rewrite history
     
  11. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,982
    3,112
    Dec 11, 2009
    Cant recall ever writing he was blind?
    I do understand that facts make you very insecure
     
  12. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,982
    3,112
    Dec 11, 2009
    I think many fighters can lose something after a loss and you could be right with Kovalev/Avarez. Who knows.
    Bit rich you calling someone a stat man when you use them to suit your agendas

    Anyway below

    I rate the Kessler win higher
    Kessler had a greater SMW resume but many on here didnt know the division before the S6 and fell into a hype trap.


    Going into the Ward fight -

    Kessler was a world champ who had beaten a world champ to get a title.
    Froch had Kesslers vacated title won off a fighter coming off a loss

    Froch is credited for beating Bute after the ward loss
    Kessler beat Froch after the Ward loss

    Froch was on a run in title fights of 5-1
    Kessler was on a run of 8-1 in title fights

    Froch had never beaten a champion for a title
    Kessler had beaten 3 champs for a title

    Kessler had only lost to Calzaghe
    Froch had lost to Kessler

    Froch was coming off some debatable decisions
    Kessler was coming off some clear wins


    I think Kessler is Wards best win followed by Kovalev and then Froch
     
  13. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,982
    3,112
    Dec 11, 2009
    So you think Kessler was with eye problems and faded also. Still if that Wards best win, so be it. It was still a decent win
     
  14. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,030
    Sep 22, 2010
    this is an appalling reply, failey, full of appallingly bad lies.

    Beyer was finished.
    Mundine won one title defence and then his time was over
    Siaca same, there is no way you can argue these two have better SMW pedigree than the Pascal, Taylor, even Dirrell is on par with them at least.

    And then you just lie outright with Sartison, he wasnt an undefeated SMW champ!

    And you lie outright with Haussler! You just lie outright!

    The only case you have is with Lucas, out of all the crap you wrote. So you didnt fail 100%.
     
  15. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,982
    3,112
    Dec 11, 2009
    I didnt realise you were so insecure. Oh dear