Boone Kirkman: 'Ten Count' Record 1-3 vs Ranked Top Ten Opponents -(Ring Magazine)...............Kirkman Ranked 11/18/70..........George Foreman ......# 3......KO by 2 ......# 10 12/12/73..........Jimmy Ellis .............# 9......W 10 ..........Unranked 06/25/74..........Ken Norton .............# 5......KO by 7.......# 10 09/17/74..........Ron Lyle .................# 4......KO by 8 ......Unranked
Rein it the #### in man. Your knocking alot of peoples posts off the board before they even get a chance to get started!! What's your ####### hurry man???
Personally, I find these posts a lot more interesting than time-machine fantasy fights. It's real data rather than arguments that can never be resolved. And I don't think posts ever get knocked off the board, just on to page 2 and back. I say keep 'em coming.
People take the time to create a thread and when 5 of these get posted in half a day or what not it sends threads back to page 2 like you said before they get a chance to even get started. So maybe you wanna keep em coming but I'm sure the people that take the time to choose carefully ( adleast in some cases) would prefer a chance to have theres looked over and find some help with answers and or opinions.
What are you########## talking about? I agree with better not having to read people argue about how the legend Jack Dempsey can knock out Jerry Quarry in the first round. Watch out Jack, Jerry would have fought Harry Wills! -See there it goes again!
My point is overkill man give other people a chance without burying there posts. Some of us dont post that constant stupid HW bull#### all the time while others here think it's the only division that exists
CONSTANT HW BULL**** ? THERE'S NO ONE IN THE WORLD WHO'S PUT THIS DETAILED STUFF TOGETHER, I GOT NEWS FOR YOU, STAY OFF MY POSTS IF YOU DO NOT APPRECIATE MY HARD WORK, I don't want to hear your ****ing BS GOT IT? PS. Are you sure your not Hillary Clinton?
I actually voted strait Republican like I have since I was 18. Not denying your putting detailed work together but do you have to flood the ####### board with them?? Do I got it?? No I guess I dont. Hillary or is it Chelsey?
Don't start a war, because i'll damn sure give you one!- I do not know why your obsessed with me, but I guess I am very Cute! I've told you to stay off my posts if you do not like them, I do not answer to you! TURN ME IN TO THEY AUTHORITIES! Are you Hillary or are you Chelsey? maybe your a combination of both? How the hell would I know, both ****s!
Hey man I'm not looking to war with anyone. I gave you ur props about the time and effort you put into these and yes ill own the fact that I came on strong. My point still is you post so many of these a day that it kicks off other peoples posts before they can really get started. I dont know if u realize it or not but i was agreeing with you about the amount of ridiculous HW threads on here. Alot of them are stupid and reworded repeats. Your stuff is original and I respect that. Theres some good stuff on here that's not HW related so why not give them a chance. Its impossible to keep up with the amount your putting on here in a day. Consider other posters man
Okay I'm not hurting anything, do you got that NOW?, there's 10,000 posters on here , if I put 200 a day (maybe I will) on here it does not matter, People want to see real stuff. not that Trevor Berbick had asthma against Mike Tyson! And would have won otherwise! I'm in Jerry Quarry's book 'Hard Luck' So my intial research has centerd around the heavyweights, I use Ring Magazine, because You cannot get complete lists of WBA, WBC, and besides they do some ****ed up things!
I disagree about the amount of posts a day but your gonna do what your gonna do so..... again I'm ####### agreeing on the stupid HW #### you just mentioned above! Yet you keep throwing it back at me like I'm supporting it! BTW I own that book. So where are you in it?
U know what man I tried to be civil I agreed to disagree and I owned that I came on too strong at first but your just a plain ###hole through an through