Loud mouth hypejobs at middleweight

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Dance84, Aug 13, 2018.


  1. LANCE99

    LANCE99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,556
    6,352
    Mar 11, 2016

    No, you're a fan of Canelo and a former fan of Oscar. That's all you've ever been here, a nuthugger of highly popular fighters.

    You can call it riding, but what I laid out he did at 160. The division that matters in which we are talking about. Fan before I knew who he was? You didn't even know who Erislandy fought just a couple of years ago. You didn't even know where Vanes fought. Which makes sense since you didn't know much about Lara or his comp. What was your response, too busy to watch every fighter? ISnt that what you said?

    I've been watching DL for at least ten years now. You know, back when you were still in junior high crying about Oscar's fishnet pics.
     
  2. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,553
    18,239
    Oct 7, 2006
    OMG Lance, you're such a little POS. lol

    This conversation has become pointless.

    Fact is Charlo is better than DL. 154 Charlo owns 160 DL any time.
     
  3. LANCE99

    LANCE99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,556
    6,352
    Mar 11, 2016
    If he beats him, or surpasses him at 160, ONLY then is it a fact.

    Here's what you would have called a fact...if you were even BORN then: Fact: Tyson is WAAY better and more accomplished than Buster Douglas.

    I'm pretty sure this went over your head, just like everything else does, you mental midget...
     
  4. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,553
    18,239
    Oct 7, 2006
    You love arguing and you're now just arguing for the sake of arguing. Come at me when you have some substance.
     
  5. LANCE99

    LANCE99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,556
    6,352
    Mar 11, 2016
    Wrong moron, if you don't see the point made, you need to hire a tutor to read it for you and explain something rather simple. You are just trying to save face as usual. Frikkin clown.
     
  6. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,553
    18,239
    Oct 7, 2006
    You said Jermall Charlo doesn't deserve to be mentioned alongside David Lemieux in a pathetic attempt to justify GGG and his team's unwillingness to consider him as an opponent. I simply gave you facts. 1. Jermall Charlo is the mandatory for the WBC MW title. 2. Jermall is a much more complete fighter than David Lemieux can ever hope to be 3. Jermall is more accomplished and is a greater fighter than Lemieux.

    Yet you have the audacity to foolishly claim he doesn't DESERVE to be mentioned alongside of DL. LMAO
     
  7. LANCE99

    LANCE99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,556
    6,352
    Mar 11, 2016

    Like I said, you took it out of context. I explained what I meant about the first one. And yet here you are, reaching to try and save face. Go away troll...
     
  8. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,553
    18,239
    Oct 7, 2006
    That's exactly what you do with my posts Lancey biy. Just like you toom out of context when I said Smith would have been GGG's most accomplished fighter. I can play your game too buddy. It goes both ways.

    If Liam smith is GGG's toughest fight, then you said Charlo doesn't DESERVE to be mentioned alongside David Lemieux.
     
  9. LANCE99

    LANCE99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,556
    6,352
    Mar 11, 2016
    Wrong ASSOL, nice try.

    What context EXACTLY did you mean when you said Liam Smith would be 3G's toughest opponent?

    Here's you opportunity to explain EXACTLY how he would be the toughest fighter 3G faced. All yours....

    If he is his toughest fight? WTF does that mean...we all know he wasn't nor would be.

    I said Charlo doesn't deserve to be mentioned along side those other contenders because they have been at MW long enough to get ranked, and face other MW's FFS. Something Jermall is yet to do, aside from Hugo Centano jr. If Jermall had more wins at 160, his place alongside would be more justified.

    Are you really this dense or just playing stupid?
     
    Odins beard likes this.
  10. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,553
    18,239
    Oct 7, 2006
    Liam Smith before losing to Canelo would have arguably been GGG's most successful opponent at that very time. You just chose to take my post out of context. Simple as that. GGG's resume is is crap up until 2017 when he barely scraped by Jacobs and drew with Canelo.
     
  11. LANCE99

    LANCE99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,556
    6,352
    Mar 11, 2016
    Successful now? You go from toughest to most successful? Why...because at JrMW , L Smith won a vacant belt and defended against two non-top ten contenders?

    THIS IS YOUR ARGUMENT? What a f'n idiot...
     
    Odins beard likes this.
  12. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,553
    18,239
    Oct 7, 2006
    Look at GGG's resume before 2016. Its pathetic. The only sitting titlist he beat was David Lemieux, every other fighter he fought was a shot or some sort of gatekeeper.
     
  13. LANCE99

    LANCE99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,556
    6,352
    Mar 11, 2016
    If you think this somehow proves Liam smith was tougher (Or is still more successful...Which is it?), you are seriously reaching. Not to mention, you know next to nothing about any opponents of 3G since you just look em up on boxrec. You didn't even know what division Vanes fought in FFS. And it wasn't too long ago you said you;d only seen ONE Erislandy lara fight. Remember that noob?