The official Gypsy King vs. Bronze Bomber brouhaha repository

I wish wilder landed one of his windmills on that british *****. BJS talks sheet all the time and then runs, also he ducked golovkin for years and GGG was absolutely right BJS is a joke. He is just as overrated as Tyson Fury is, both are featherfisted bums.

 

Wilder is lucky BJS's son wasn't there. A swift punch to the knackers and Wilder would be on the floor crying.

 

You would see color in US. I lived in UK and couldn’t stand that island , but UK is a lot less racially segregated and that’s a good thing.

 

I think Saunders made three big mistakes.

MISTAKE #1
He didn't just call Wilder a racist, he called him a racist ****. That's a big difference in tone.

MISTAKE #2
He forgot he'd said it and went to shake hands with the guy. Was a little startled when Wilder brought it up.

MISTAKE #3
He interrupted a group of black men while they were eating their chicken.

 

The respectful chicken thrower

 

Can you say why? Tyson could box his head off for 8 rounds and then gets Koed, it could be controversial, a draw, a real barn burner.... etc

 

Will he get a fair shake in the US?

 

it's hardly as if anyone has been robbed against wilder before.

 

Why not. Recent fights have demonstrated that British judging is worse than US and German judging.

 

Wilder is a **** really. To start that in a public restaurant full of people and in another country is just classless. BJS is a **** too but he was talking to him like a man before Wilder stood up and got aggressive

 

I don't think he will have the conditioning to box a full 12 rounds at his sharpest like he did against Vlad , I think Wilder will catch him and put him down.

 

Nonsense. Kovalev v Ward I, Golovkin v Jacobs, Golovkin v Alvarez

 

which fights in britian have been worse than the german judging.

 

Haven't you just diagnosed him, though? 'No evidence'.... 'He's coherent and understands what he is doing'. That sounds like a diagnosis to me, and I am certain you're not a fully-qualified psychologist.

You see your problem here and in general? You write to project utter authority on many subjects of which you are not particularly well-informed.

 

I can still remember Reid v Ottke, a real shocker?